Validating the <scp>PANDORA GenAI</scp> Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment: A Field Test of All Translation and Interpreting <scp>BA</scp> Assignments

ABSTRACT This study, conducted at a fully online Spanish higher education institution, documents the validation of a bespoke quality assessment tool designed to measure the susceptibility of formative assignments to AI academic misconduct. The research explored the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies in the Humanities. The framework study consisted of four stages: the design of a rubric (Stages 1–3) and its large‐scale validation (Stage 4) through a field test in the Translation and Interpreting Studies Bachelor's Degree. This paper presents stage 4 results where lecturers ( n = 29), using a bottom‐up approach, voluntarily applied the tool to their teaching contexts and analysed assignments ( n = 151) using the rubric, revealing significant vulnerabilities in assessments easily converted by GenAI or lacking originality and collaboration. The findings guided AI‐integrated assessment designs that encourage complexity, creativity, and ethical engagement. This study outlines effective GenAI practices in assessment design and emphasises innovative methods for academic integrity in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the PANDORA GenAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment: A Field Test of All Translation and Interpreting BA Assignments

Nuria Brufau Alvira, Peter Bannister, Alexandra Santamaría Urbieta
1 citations
Higher Education Quarterly
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Validating the PANDORA GenAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment: A Field Test of All Translation and Interpreting BA Assignments

Nuria Brufau Alvira, Peter Bannister, Alexandra Santamaría Urbieta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study, conducted at a fully online Spanish higher education institution, documents the validation of a bespoke quality assessment tool designed to measure the susceptibility of formative assignments to AI academic misconduct. The research explored the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies in the Humanities. The framework study consisted of four stages: the design of a rubric (Stages 1–3) and its large‐scale validation (Stage 4) through a field test in the Translation and Interpreting Studies Bachelor's Degree. This paper presents stage 4 results where lecturers ( n = 29), using a bottom‐up approach, voluntarily applied the tool to their teaching contexts and analysed assignments ( n = 151) using the rubric, revealing significant vulnerabilities in assessments easily converted by GenAI or lacking originality and collaboration. The findings guided AI‐integrated assessment designs that encourage complexity, creativity, and ethical engagement. This study outlines effective GenAI practices in assessment design and emphasises innovative methods for academic integrity in higher education.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 79(4)
Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES)
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.