Spatial association and trade-off/synergy relationships between ecosystem health and human well-being: a case study of the Manas River Basin

• Quantitative assessment of ecosystem health (EH) and human well-being (HWB) in the basin. • EH and HWB exhibit spatial correlation, yet demonstrate a declining trend. • Unraveling the interactive mechanism between different dimensions of EH and HWB from a trade-offs/synergies perspective. • The “agricultural oasis” development model profoundly influences the spatiotemporal coupling between EH and HWB. Identifying the linkage between ecosystem health (EH) and human well-being (HWB) is crucial for understanding natural–social system interactions. However, research on the spatial associations and conflict/cobenefit relationships between EH and HWB remains limited. Using the Manas River Basin as a case study, we quantitatively assessed EH and HWB from 2000 to 2020. By integrating Lee’s L statistic and Spearman’s rank correlation, we revealed their spatial correlation and trade-off/synergy mechanisms between EH and HWB. Results show that (1) EH exhibited a slight increase (0.14 → 0.166), with a “high–medium–high–low” spatial pattern from south to north. High values were concentrated in upstream forests and midstream agricultural oases, while low values occurred in piedmont grasslands and downstream deserts, closely linked to oasis agricultural development. (2) HWB increased significantly (0.106 → 0.738), shifting from economic well-being (EcoWB) and educational/cultural well-being (ECWB) dominance to diversified development encompassing health and safety well-being (HSWB), environmental well-being (EnvWB), and EcoWB. Its spatial evolution followed an urbanization-driven “agglomeration → diffusion → rebalancing” pattern centered on oasis towns. (3) EH and HWB showed significant spatial dependence, but their correlation weakened over time, indicating spatial decoupling of human activities from natural systems. High EH–high HWB clusters were predominantly in midstream oases, whereas high EH–low HWB clusters were located in southern forests. (4) Trade-offs and synergies varied along the landscape gradient: ecological stress traded off with all HWB types, while ecological function showed stable synergies with EnvWB and increasing synergies with EcoWB and ECWB. These findings provide insights into EH–HWB coevolution and support sustainable development in arid-region basins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial association and trade-off/synergy relationships between ecosystem health and human well-being: a case study of the Manas River Basin

Yichen Yan, Xiaobin Dong, Rui Liu, Xuechao Wang et al.
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
article

Spatial association and trade-off/synergy relationships between ecosystem health and human well-being: a case study of the Manas River Basin

Yichen Yan, Xiaobin Dong, Rui Liu, Xuechao Wang, Xiaomin Xiao, Ruiming Xiao, Yuxin Qi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Quantitative assessment of ecosystem health (EH) and human well-being (HWB) in the basin. • EH and HWB exhibit spatial correlation, yet demonstrate a declining trend. • Unraveling the interactive mechanism between different dimensions of EH and HWB from a trade-offs/synergies perspective. • The “agricultural oasis” development model profoundly influences the spatiotemporal coupling between EH and HWB. Identifying the linkage between ecosystem health (EH) and human well-being (HWB) is crucial for understanding natural–social system interactions. However, research on the spatial associations and conflict/cobenefit relationships between EH and HWB remains limited. Using the Manas River Basin as a case study, we quantitatively assessed EH and HWB from 2000 to 2020. By integrating Lee’s L statistic and Spearman’s rank correlation, we revealed their spatial correlation and trade-off/synergy mechanisms between EH and HWB. Results show that (1) EH exhibited a slight increase (0.14 → 0.166), with a “high–medium–high–low” spatial pattern from south to north. High values were concentrated in upstream forests and midstream agricultural oases, while low values occurred in piedmont grasslands and downstream deserts, closely linked to oasis agricultural development. (2) HWB increased significantly (0.106 → 0.738), shifting from economic well-being (EcoWB) and educational/cultural well-being (ECWB) dominance to diversified development encompassing health and safety well-being (HSWB), environmental well-being (EnvWB), and EcoWB. Its spatial evolution followed an urbanization-driven “agglomeration → diffusion → rebalancing” pattern centered on oasis towns. (3) EH and HWB showed significant spatial dependence, but their correlation weakened over time, indicating spatial decoupling of human activities from natural systems. High EH–high HWB clusters were predominantly in midstream oases, whereas high EH–low HWB clusters were located in southern forests. (4) Trade-offs and synergies varied along the landscape gradient: ecological stress traded off with all HWB types, while ecological function showed stable synergies with EnvWB and increasing synergies with EcoWB and ECWB. These findings provide insights into EH–HWB coevolution and support sustainable development in arid-region basins.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 178
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.