Cortical Network Topological Modifications Underlie Clinical Evolution in the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke
BackgroundFollowing stroke, brain networks can be described by strength of local connections (clustering coefficient [<i>C</i>w]) and strength of global interconnections (path length [<i>L</i>w]) between nodes, and their balance (Small-worldness [<i>S</i>w]). <i>Objective</i>. To identify electroencephalography (EEG) networks predicting clinical evolution in stroke through a multicenter cross-sectional study.MethodsWe consecutively recruited 87 anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients. We obtained resting-state EEG (31 electrodes, 10-10 system) within 24 hours from stroke (<i>T</i>0) and at discharge from stroke unit (4-10 days after stroke; <i>T</i>1). EEG data were elaborated with EEGLAB and Lagged Linear Coherence among cortical sources of EEG signals was analyzed using eLORETA. We performed a multiple linear regression with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at <i>T</i>0 and <i>T</i>1 as dependent variables and <i>C</i>w, <i>L</i>w, and <i>S</i>w of delta, theta, and alpha networks as independent variables.ResultsWe found a negative association between alpha1 <i>S</i>w and NIHSS at <i>T</i>0 (β = -.232, <i>P</i> = .04) meaning that the lower is alpha efficiency the higher is clinical severity and a positive association between delta <i>S</i>w and NIHSS at <i>T</i>1 (β = .423, <i>P</i> < .001) meaning that the higher is delta efficiency the higher is clinical severity. We found positive association between delta <i>S</i>w at <i>T</i>0 and NIHSS at <i>T</i>1 (β = .259, <i>P</i> = .02), meaning that the higher is delta efficiency in the hyperacute phase the higher is clinical severity at <i>T</i>1.ConclusionsA higher delta <i>S</i>w within 24 hours after stroke is associated to higher NIHSS within 10 days. Delta brain network rearrangement in the hyperacute phase is a potential neurophysiological measure to be integrated in multi-modal prognostic models.
Authors
- Paolo Manganotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-6268)
- Silvia Giovannini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-752X)
- Matteo Grazzini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6781-9107)
- Danilo Pani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-0875)
- Simona Crosetti
- Aurelia Zauli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5646-5745)
- Simona Sacco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-1939)
- Giuseppe Reale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-4298)
- Giovanni Furlanis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-0239)
- Chiara Iacovelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-6055)
- M. De Marco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-1660)
- Lucio Marinelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-7654)
- Miloš Ajčević (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8307-4360)
- Pietro Caliandro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1190-4879)
- Giulia Baldazzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-4961)
- Marta Garbuglia
Institutions
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- University of L'Aquila (IT)
- Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
- University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- University of Genoa (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251363243
- Primary Topic
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00