How LLM-Awareness and Explanation Format Shape Driver Experience During AV Anomalies

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous vehicles (AVs) aims to enhance human-AV interaction through natural language explanations. However, the extent to which driver awareness of LLM involvement, and explanation format itself, influences driver experience during unexpected AV behavior remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the impact of drivers’ beliefs about the explanation source (i.e., LLM-generated vs. human experts) across three explanation formats: causal, counterfactual, and contrastive. Results showed a tendency toward greater trust in human expert-derived explanations, particularly in counterfactual scenarios. Furthermore, contrastive explanations significantly reduced mental workload compared to causal and counterfactual formats, demonstrating a distinct advantage in cognitive processing efficiency. These findings indicate that strategically tailoring the selection of explanation source and format to the time-sensitivity and complexity of specific driving scenarios could improve driver trust and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251363190
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How LLM-Awareness and Explanation Format Shape Driver Experience During AV Anomalies

Lilit Avetisyan, Feng Zhou, X. Jessie Yang
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

How LLM-Awareness and Explanation Format Shape Driver Experience During AV Anomalies

Lilit Avetisyan, Feng Zhou, X. Jessie Yang
article en

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous vehicles (AVs) aims to enhance human-AV interaction through natural language explanations. However, the extent to which driver awareness of LLM involvement, and explanation format itself, influences driver experience during unexpected AV behavior remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the impact of drivers’ beliefs about the explanation source (i.e., LLM-generated vs. human experts) across three explanation formats: causal, counterfactual, and contrastive. Results showed a tendency toward greater trust in human expert-derived explanations, particularly in counterfactual scenarios. Furthermore, contrastive explanations significantly reduced mental workload compared to causal and counterfactual formats, demonstrating a distinct advantage in cognitive processing efficiency. These findings indicate that strategically tailoring the selection of explanation source and format to the time-sensitivity and complexity of specific driving scenarios could improve driver trust and performance.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Michigan (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How LLM-Awareness and Explanation Format Shape Driver Experience During AV Anomalies — Lilit Avetisyan, Feng Zhou, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS