Musical Expertise and Cognitive Abilities: No Advantage for Professionals over Amateurs

It is commonly assumed that music training enhances general cognitive abilities, implying a positive, experience-dependent link between musical expertise and cognitive performance. To test this assumption, we reanalyzed data from the Music Ensemble project—a large-scale, multi-laboratory initiative spanning over 30 laboratories from 15 countries. We compared nonmusicians (n = 608), amateur musicians (n = 289), and professional musicians (n = 352) on measures of musical ability, general cognition, and personality, while controlling for demographic differences. As expected, musical abilities increased with expertise: professionals outperformed amateurs, who outperformed nonmusicians. For cognitive performance, however, the pattern was more complex. Only short-term memory (STM) for melodies increased monotonically with expertise. Verbal STM was similar across groups, and other cognitive domains revealed nonlinear associations. Both musician groups outperformed nonmusicians in visuospatial STM, vocabulary, and executive functioning (updating), but professionals did not exceed amateurs in any of these domains, and they even performed worse in nonverbal reasoning. Personality traits also differed across groups. Professionals scored higher on open-mindedness than both other groups, but lower on agreeableness than amateurs. Thus, despite superior musical abilities and distinctive personalities, professional musicians showed no cognitive advantage over amateurs. These findings challenge claims about the cognitive benefits of musical expertise and call for more nuanced models of how music training relates to general cognition.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/p28x6_v1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Musical Expertise and Cognitive Abilities: No Advantage for Professionals over Amateurs

César F. Lima, Francesca Talamini, E. Glenn Schellenberg, Massimo Grassi
1 citations
Diverse Music Education Insights
19.03
article

Musical Expertise and Cognitive Abilities: No Advantage for Professionals over Amateurs

César F. Lima, Francesca Talamini, E. Glenn Schellenberg, Massimo Grassi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that music training enhances general cognitive abilities, implying a positive, experience-dependent link between musical expertise and cognitive performance. To test this assumption, we reanalyzed data from the Music Ensemble project—a large-scale, multi-laboratory initiative spanning over 30 laboratories from 15 countries. We compared nonmusicians (n = 608), amateur musicians (n = 289), and professional musicians (n = 352) on measures of musical ability, general cognition, and personality, while controlling for demographic differences. As expected, musical abilities increased with expertise: professionals outperformed amateurs, who outperformed nonmusicians. For cognitive performance, however, the pattern was more complex. Only short-term memory (STM) for melodies increased monotonically with expertise. Verbal STM was similar across groups, and other cognitive domains revealed nonlinear associations. Both musician groups outperformed nonmusicians in visuospatial STM, vocabulary, and executive functioning (updating), but professionals did not exceed amateurs in any of these domains, and they even performed worse in nonverbal reasoning. Personality traits also differed across groups. Professionals scored higher on open-mindedness than both other groups, but lower on agreeableness than amateurs. Thus, despite superior musical abilities and distinctive personalities, professional musicians showed no cognitive advantage over amateurs. These findings challenge claims about the cognitive benefits of musical expertise and call for more nuanced models of how music training relates to general cognition.

Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diverse Music Education Insights
19.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.