Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Study

AimTo determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) aids in improving glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes patients (T2DM) with foot ulcers and improve wound healing.MethodsRetrospective study on patients attending the high-risk diabetes foot clinic for the management of complex diabetic foot ulcers were provided with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices (Freestyle Libre 2). Patients were reviewed in the foot clinic on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, depending on the severity of their foot ulcers and glycaemic control, which was reviewed at each visit. HbA1c was measured not more than 90 days prior to starting CGM and three months after the start of CGM. Wound size was measured at start and after 3 months of CGM use. Data of the eligible patients was reviewed from the medical records.Results22 patients with T2DM with active diabetic foot ulcers were included in this study. Mean age was 65.43 years (range 39-87). Mean HbA1c prior to providing CGM was 84.10 Mmol/mol (range 54-132). The mean HbA1c after three months of CGM use was 65.05 Mmol/mol (range 32-94). Mean reduction in HbA1c was 19.05 ± 22.07 mmol/mol (p = 0.0011) and the greatest improvements were noted in those who had higher HbA1c levels at baseline. Wound size at baseline was 1.53 (0.75-7.62) cm<sup>2</sup> and after 3 months it was 0.42 (0.0-1.16) cm<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001); complete wound healing achieved in 3 patients.ConclusionThis study showed a significant improvement in glycaemic control with the use of CGM and had a positive influence on wound healing. The utility of CGM in improving glycaemic control is well established and is currently widely used in type 1 diabetes mellitus and pregnancy but not directly recommended for patients with foot ulcers according to NICE guidelines. Further follow-up and larger-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and to observe the impact on wound healing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251369622
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Study

Animesh A. Sinha, Edward Bernard Jude, R. Sathish Srinivasan
1 citations
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
article

Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Study

Animesh A. Sinha, Edward Bernard Jude, R. Sathish Srinivasan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AimTo determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) aids in improving glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes patients (T2DM) with foot ulcers and improve wound healing.MethodsRetrospective study on patients attending the high-risk diabetes foot clinic for the management of complex diabetic foot ulcers were provided with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices (Freestyle Libre 2). Patients were reviewed in the foot clinic on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, depending on the severity of their foot ulcers and glycaemic control, which was reviewed at each visit. HbA1c was measured not more than 90 days prior to starting CGM and three months after the start of CGM. Wound size was measured at start and after 3 months of CGM use. Data of the eligible patients was reviewed from the medical records.Results22 patients with T2DM with active diabetic foot ulcers were included in this study. Mean age was 65.43 years (range 39-87). Mean HbA1c prior to providing CGM was 84.10 Mmol/mol (range 54-132). The mean HbA1c after three months of CGM use was 65.05 Mmol/mol (range 32-94). Mean reduction in HbA1c was 19.05 ± 22.07 mmol/mol (p = 0.0011) and the greatest improvements were noted in those who had higher HbA1c levels at baseline. Wound size at baseline was 1.53 (0.75-7.62) cm<sup>2</sup> and after 3 months it was 0.42 (0.0-1.16) cm<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001); complete wound healing achieved in 3 patients.ConclusionThis study showed a significant improvement in glycaemic control with the use of CGM and had a positive influence on wound healing. The utility of CGM in improving glycaemic control is well established and is currently widely used in type 1 diabetes mellitus and pregnancy but not directly recommended for patients with foot ulcers according to NICE guidelines. Further follow-up and larger-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and to observe the impact on wound healing.

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Manchester (GB), Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Laiko General Hospital of Athens (GR), Diabetes UK (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.