Attention to blood pressure cuff sizes is important for home and in-clinic blood pressure measurement
Arm circumference determines appropriate blood pressure cuff size, which is critical for accurate measurements. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to assess cuff size needs according to mid-arm circumferences of Australian adults. Based on typical in-clinic cuff sizes, most Australians would require a medium (51.7%) or large (44.5%) cuff, which means that the cuff would need to be changed for almost every second patient. Most home devices are supplied with a standard (22-32 cm) or wide-range (22-42 cm) cuff, these were found to be unsuitable for 9 million adults (48.3%) and over 701,995 adults (3.8%), respectively. Concerningly, the standard cuff size available with commonly used home devices would be unsuitable for large proportions of people in higher cardiovascular risk groups (e.g. hypertension (59.7%), diabetes (66.3%), high cholesterol (55.6%) and obesity (92.3%)). This work highlights attention must be paid to selecting appropriate cuff sizes for accurate blood pressure measurements in-clinic and at home. Arm circumference of Australian adults to assess cuff size requirements for in-clinic and home blood pressure measurements.
Authors
- Shiva Raj Mishra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-3504)
- Clara K Chow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-0038)
- Ritu Trivedi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-2541)
- Niamh Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-5594)
- Dean S. Picone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-1634)
- Mark Nelson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-6096)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Westmead Hospital (AU)
- South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hypertension Research
- Published
- 2025-08-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02308-7
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.55
Funders
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council