Konsep Kewenangan Bawaslu Kabupaten Sleman Pada Putusan Ultra Petita Adjudikasi Pemilu Tahun 2019

This research is entitled “The Concept of Bawaslu Sleman Regency’s Authority in the Ultra Petita Decision of the 2019 Election Adjudication.” It addresses two main legal issues: (1) Whether the ultra petita decision issued by Bawaslu Sleman Regency in the adjudication of the 2019 legislative candidacy administrative dispute for the Sleman Regency Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) is legally justifiable; and (2) How Bawaslu Sleman Regency’s authority in issuing an ultra petita decision can be viewed from the perspective of legal certainty theory. This research employs a normative legal method. Data were collected through literature review and interviews with several informants. The findings reveal that Bawaslu Sleman Regency's ultra petita decision is legally justifiable, as it was based on fulfilling the constitutional rights of legislative candidates from the Hanura Party in Sleman Regency, in accordance with Article 28J of the 1945 Constitution. From the perspective of legal certainty theory, Bawaslu’s authority in issuing such a decision aligns with Gustav Radbruch’s concept of legal certainty, which he defines as Sicherheit durch das Recht or certainty through law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61234/hd.v25i1.83
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Konsep Kewenangan Bawaslu Kabupaten Sleman Pada Putusan Ultra Petita Adjudikasi Pemilu Tahun 2019

Lis Budi Qurnianti, B. Hestu C. Handoyo, E. Sundari
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Konsep Kewenangan Bawaslu Kabupaten Sleman Pada Putusan Ultra Petita Adjudikasi Pemilu Tahun 2019

Lis Budi Qurnianti, B. Hestu C. Handoyo, E. Sundari
article en

Abstract

This research is entitled “The Concept of Bawaslu Sleman Regency’s Authority in the Ultra Petita Decision of the 2019 Election Adjudication.” It addresses two main legal issues: (1) Whether the ultra petita decision issued by Bawaslu Sleman Regency in the adjudication of the 2019 legislative candidacy administrative dispute for the Sleman Regency Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) is legally justifiable; and (2) How Bawaslu Sleman Regency’s authority in issuing an ultra petita decision can be viewed from the perspective of legal certainty theory. This research employs a normative legal method. Data were collected through literature review and interviews with several informants. The findings reveal that Bawaslu Sleman Regency's ultra petita decision is legally justifiable, as it was based on fulfilling the constitutional rights of legislative candidates from the Hanura Party in Sleman Regency, in accordance with Article 28J of the 1945 Constitution. From the perspective of legal certainty theory, Bawaslu’s authority in issuing such a decision aligns with Gustav Radbruch’s concept of legal certainty, which he defines as Sicherheit durch das Recht or certainty through law.

Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)Vol. 25(1)
Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.