Strain rate sensitivity of five 3D printed polymer materials

The strain rate sensitivity on the uniaxial compressive response of five 3D printed polymer-based materials was investigated. Five commonly used polymers – acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), nylon, polylactic acid (PLA), toughened polylactic acid (TPLA), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) – were studied. Cylindrical specimens (Ø8 mm × 8 mm) were printed using an Ultimaker S5 3D printer, with a print layer height of 0.1 mm and identical print paths. The manufacturing quality of the 3D-printed specimens was assessed using X-ray computed tomography (CT) at a resolution of 27 μm. Among the materials tested, TPU and nylon exhibited the highest levels of porosity. Low-strain rate tests ranging from 10 -3 /s to 1/s were carried out using a universal testing machine, while tests at strain rates above 1/s were conducted with a split-Hopkinson pressure bar. All five polymers exhibited positive strain rate sensitivity. The strain rate coefficients in the Johnson-Cook (J-C) material model were 0.049, 0.072, 0.071, 0.073, and 0.625 for ABS, nylon, PLA, TPLA, and TPU, respectively. The J-C model successfully captured the strain rate effects for ABS, PLA, TPLA, and nylon but failed to capture the low strain rate behaviour for TPU. • 3D-printed polymers exhibit high strain-rate sensitivity. • ABS, PLA, TPLA, and nylon show reasonable agreement with the Johnson-Cook model. • TPU exhibited different mechanical behaviour at quasi-static and dynamic loading rates. • Porosity distribution in 3D-printed samples were material-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2025.128953
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strain rate sensitivity of five 3D printed polymer materials

Juan Pablo Escobedo, Hari Bahadur Dura, Hongxu Wang, Paul J. Hazell et al.
7 citations
Polymer
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
article

Strain rate sensitivity of five 3D printed polymer materials

Juan Pablo Escobedo, Hari Bahadur Dura, Hongxu Wang, Paul J. Hazell, Jianshen Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The strain rate sensitivity on the uniaxial compressive response of five 3D printed polymer-based materials was investigated. Five commonly used polymers – acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), nylon, polylactic acid (PLA), toughened polylactic acid (TPLA), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) – were studied. Cylindrical specimens (Ø8 mm × 8 mm) were printed using an Ultimaker S5 3D printer, with a print layer height of 0.1 mm and identical print paths. The manufacturing quality of the 3D-printed specimens was assessed using X-ray computed tomography (CT) at a resolution of 27 μm. Among the materials tested, TPU and nylon exhibited the highest levels of porosity. Low-strain rate tests ranging from 10 -3 /s to 1/s were carried out using a universal testing machine, while tests at strain rates above 1/s were conducted with a split-Hopkinson pressure bar. All five polymers exhibited positive strain rate sensitivity. The strain rate coefficients in the Johnson-Cook (J-C) material model were 0.049, 0.072, 0.071, 0.073, and 0.625 for ABS, nylon, PLA, TPLA, and TPU, respectively. The J-C model successfully captured the strain rate effects for ABS, PLA, TPLA, and nylon but failed to capture the low strain rate behaviour for TPU. • 3D-printed polymers exhibit high strain-rate sensitivity. • ABS, PLA, TPLA, and nylon show reasonable agreement with the Johnson-Cook model. • TPU exhibited different mechanical behaviour at quasi-static and dynamic loading rates. • Porosity distribution in 3D-printed samples were material-dependent.

PolymerVol. 337
University of Canberra (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.