Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk

This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108847
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk

Sandip Dhole, Cameron Truong, Pradip Banerjee, Sudipta Bose
3 citations
Energy Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
article

Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk

Sandip Dhole, Cameron Truong, Pradip Banerjee, Sudipta Bose
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.

Energy EconomicsVol. 150
Indian Institute of Management Indore (IN), Monash University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk — Sandip Dhole, Cameron Truong, et al. · Energy Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS