Do climate policy uncertainty, green finance, and the energy market matter for carbon price? Evidence from China

Using quantile Granger causality test and Quantile Vector Autoregression (QVAR) dynamic time and frequency, this paper investigates the driving factor of China carbon pricing and provide risk hedging strategies. We examine the relationship between the carbon trading market, clean energy market, traditional energy market, green finance market, and climate policy uncertainty under different quantiles and periods. Our study reveals that the overall relationship between China's carbon market and other markets, such as the clean energy market, traditional energy market, and green financial market, follows a U-shaped curve. During financial stress periods (τ=0.05 and τ=0.95), the total connectedness of the system reaches 85.78 % and 84.18 %, respectively, compared to 22.13 % under normal conditions (τ=0.50). Meanwhile, we also find incorporating energy market and the green stock market into a portfolio can significantly hedge systemic risks, irrespective of the level of climate policy uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.08.027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do climate policy uncertainty, green finance, and the energy market matter for carbon price? Evidence from China

Mianmian Chen, Wenhua Yang, Lian Xiong, Wen Luo
2 citations
Energy Reports
Market Dynamics and Volatility
6.26
article

Do climate policy uncertainty, green finance, and the energy market matter for carbon price? Evidence from China

Mianmian Chen, Wenhua Yang, Lian Xiong, Wen Luo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using quantile Granger causality test and Quantile Vector Autoregression (QVAR) dynamic time and frequency, this paper investigates the driving factor of China carbon pricing and provide risk hedging strategies. We examine the relationship between the carbon trading market, clean energy market, traditional energy market, green finance market, and climate policy uncertainty under different quantiles and periods. Our study reveals that the overall relationship between China's carbon market and other markets, such as the clean energy market, traditional energy market, and green financial market, follows a U-shaped curve. During financial stress periods (τ=0.05 and τ=0.95), the total connectedness of the system reaches 85.78 % and 84.18 %, respectively, compared to 22.13 % under normal conditions (τ=0.50). Meanwhile, we also find incorporating energy market and the green stock market into a portfolio can significantly hedge systemic risks, irrespective of the level of climate policy uncertainty.

Energy ReportsVol. 14
Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do climate policy uncertainty, green finance, and the energy market matter for carbon price? Evidence from China — Mianmian Chen, Wenhua Yang, et al. · Energy Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS