The Gap–Giant Association: Are Planets Hiding in the Gaps?

Abstract A handful of stars are known to host both an inner system of multiple transiting planets and an outer giant planet. These systems all feature a prominent gap between the orbits of two of the transiting planets, distinguishing them from typical multiplanet systems with more uniform orbital spacings. The reason for the association between inner gaps and outer giants is unknown. In this paper, we assess whether undiscovered planets might occupy these gaps in systems with outer giants. For each of the four relevant systems—Kepler-48, Kepler-65, Kepler-90, and Kepler-139—we found that a typical small planet (∼1–20 M ⊕ ) could reside in the gap without inducing dynamical instability. However, in each case the gravitational influence of the outer giant planet is insufficient to tilt the orbit of the hypothetical planet by enough to prevent transits, strongly disfavoring a proposed theory for the observed gap–giant association. The gaps might instead contain smaller, undetected planets (≲ 1 R ⊕ ), or be entirely devoid of planets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adf06b
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gap–Giant Association: Are Planets Hiding in the Gaps?

Caleb Lammers, Joshua N. Winn
1 links
The Astrophysical Journal
Astro and Planetary Science
article

The Gap–Giant Association: Are Planets Hiding in the Gaps?

Caleb Lammers, Joshua N. Winn
article en

Abstract

Abstract A handful of stars are known to host both an inner system of multiple transiting planets and an outer giant planet. These systems all feature a prominent gap between the orbits of two of the transiting planets, distinguishing them from typical multiplanet systems with more uniform orbital spacings. The reason for the association between inner gaps and outer giants is unknown. In this paper, we assess whether undiscovered planets might occupy these gaps in systems with outer giants. For each of the four relevant systems—Kepler-48, Kepler-65, Kepler-90, and Kepler-139—we found that a typical small planet (∼1–20 M ⊕ ) could reside in the gap without inducing dynamical instability. However, in each case the gravitational influence of the outer giant planet is insufficient to tilt the orbit of the hypothetical planet by enough to prevent transits, strongly disfavoring a proposed theory for the observed gap–giant association. The gaps might instead contain smaller, undetected planets (≲ 1 R ⊕ ), or be entirely devoid of planets.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 989(2)
Princeton University (US)
Princeton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.