Making student voice heard in dialogic feedback: feedback design matters

Introduction Making student voice heard is crucial for productive feedback. However, this is seldom in practice in the exam-oriented context because students lack opportunities and support to give voice in feedback processes. To bridge the gap, this collaborative action research explored how feedback could be redesigned to invite student voice in a Singapore secondary school. Methodology We collaborated with three Social Studies teachers to transform their error-focused practice into dialogic feedback accentuating student voice. Drawing on the Lundy model of participation and self-determination theory, the teachers designed a feedback log to let 48 secondary four (equivalent to Grade 10) learners articulate their voice and psychological needs for competence and relatedness. Results Analysis of feedback logs, student focus groups and teacher interviews indicated three main aspects of student voice: (i) grades (numeric feedback) as an indicator to monitor one's goal achievement and exam preparation efforts; (ii) challenges in making feedforward; and (iii) learners' feedback engagement and motivation largely shaped by teacher response. Discussion Given the context-dependent nature of tasks in Social Studies, verbal reciprocal exchange would be useful in developing students' higher-order thinking skills for feedforward. Implications for productive feedback designs are discussed, and avenues for future research outlined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1550328
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making student voice heard in dialogic feedback: feedback design matters

Kelvin Heng Kiat Tan, Jessica To, Dominique Aluquin
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

Making student voice heard in dialogic feedback: feedback design matters

Kelvin Heng Kiat Tan, Jessica To, Dominique Aluquin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Making student voice heard is crucial for productive feedback. However, this is seldom in practice in the exam-oriented context because students lack opportunities and support to give voice in feedback processes. To bridge the gap, this collaborative action research explored how feedback could be redesigned to invite student voice in a Singapore secondary school. Methodology We collaborated with three Social Studies teachers to transform their error-focused practice into dialogic feedback accentuating student voice. Drawing on the Lundy model of participation and self-determination theory, the teachers designed a feedback log to let 48 secondary four (equivalent to Grade 10) learners articulate their voice and psychological needs for competence and relatedness. Results Analysis of feedback logs, student focus groups and teacher interviews indicated three main aspects of student voice: (i) grades (numeric feedback) as an indicator to monitor one's goal achievement and exam preparation efforts; (ii) challenges in making feedforward; and (iii) learners' feedback engagement and motivation largely shaped by teacher response. Discussion Given the context-dependent nature of tasks in Social Studies, verbal reciprocal exchange would be useful in developing students' higher-order thinking skills for feedforward. Implications for productive feedback designs are discussed, and avenues for future research outlined.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), National University Health System (SG), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making student voice heard in dialogic feedback: feedback design matters — Kelvin Heng Kiat Tan, Jessica To, et al. · Frontiers in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS