Benchmark study of deep super-resolution models for digital holography: quantitative phase and intensity evaluation

Despite good axial resolution in holographic microscopy, lateral resolution remains constrained by optical limitations, pixel size, and noise. These restrictions hinder accurate reconstruction of fine structural and phase details. To address this, we evaluate three deep-learning super-resolution models (RCAN, SwinIR, and a conditional diffusion network) on 1,440 off-axis digital holograms of microbeads downsampled by 2 ×, 3 ×, and 4 ×. We compare their performance to bicubic spline interpolation using PSNR, SSIM, MSE, and phase-derived depth errors. RCAN and SwinIR yield the most accurate reconstructions, preserving structural and quantitative phase information, and offering guidance on model selection for phase-focused holography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.568571
Primary Topic
Digital Holography and Microscopy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmark study of deep super-resolution models for digital holography: quantitative phase and intensity evaluation

Ali Anıl Demirçalı, G. Bora Esmer, Hüseyin Üvet, Yağmur Işık et al.
Optics Express
Digital Holography and Microscopy
article

Benchmark study of deep super-resolution models for digital holography: quantitative phase and intensity evaluation

Ali Anıl Demirçalı, G. Bora Esmer, Hüseyin Üvet, Yağmur Işık, Berkay Abdioglu, Rana Gürsoy, Ibrahim Cem Balci
article en

Abstract

Despite good axial resolution in holographic microscopy, lateral resolution remains constrained by optical limitations, pixel size, and noise. These restrictions hinder accurate reconstruction of fine structural and phase details. To address this, we evaluate three deep-learning super-resolution models (RCAN, SwinIR, and a conditional diffusion network) on 1,440 off-axis digital holograms of microbeads downsampled by 2 ×, 3 ×, and 4 ×. We compare their performance to bicubic spline interpolation using PSNR, SSIM, MSE, and phase-derived depth errors. RCAN and SwinIR yield the most accurate reconstructions, preserving structural and quantitative phase information, and offering guidance on model selection for phase-focused holography.

Optics ExpressVol. 33(18)
Yıldız Technical University (TR), Istinye University (TR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Digital Holography and Microscopy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.