Diversity by Design: Real-World Data to Enhance Representation in Clinical Cancer Research

Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and health care equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, patients with cancer who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared with their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on underrepresented populations, thus improving the external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment, and other elements and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-1255
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity by Design: Real-World Data to Enhance Representation in Clinical Cancer Research

Mehmet Burcu, Ashley Jaksa, S H Kim, Mark Stewart et al.
2 citations
Clinical Cancer Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
article

Diversity by Design: Real-World Data to Enhance Representation in Clinical Cancer Research

Mehmet Burcu, Ashley Jaksa, S H Kim, Mark Stewart, Thao Vo, Benjamin Bates, Wei Zhou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and health care equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, patients with cancer who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared with their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on underrepresented populations, thus improving the external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment, and other elements and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 31(21)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston University (US), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), United States Military Academy (US), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Switzerland) (CH), Aetion (United States) (US), Merck Institute for Science Education (US), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Friends of Cancer Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.