Content moderation in (decentralized) metaverses

This contribution provides an EU-based regulatory overview and a literature review on content moderation in the metaverse, with a focus on metaverses with decentralized architectures. Current enforced regulations on content moderation require hosting service providers to moderate and remove illegal contents upon knowledge of such content shared on the platform. However, content moderation in the metaverse raises challenges with regard to the typologies of illegal content potentially shared, to efficient content moderation processes and surveillance, and to the actual possibility of content moderation and removal in decentralized infrastructures. Given the lack of regulations specifically addressing content moderation in the metaverse, this article aims to contribute to the debate in the literature and discusses possible policy solutions and approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interactive Entertainment Law Review
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2025.0010
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Content moderation in (decentralized) metaverses

Gian Marco Bovenzi
3 citations
Interactive Entertainment Law Review
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
7.44
article

Content moderation in (decentralized) metaverses

Gian Marco Bovenzi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This contribution provides an EU-based regulatory overview and a literature review on content moderation in the metaverse, with a focus on metaverses with decentralized architectures. Current enforced regulations on content moderation require hosting service providers to moderate and remove illegal contents upon knowledge of such content shared on the platform. However, content moderation in the metaverse raises challenges with regard to the typologies of illegal content potentially shared, to efficient content moderation processes and surveillance, and to the actual possibility of content moderation and removal in decentralized infrastructures. Given the lack of regulations specifically addressing content moderation in the metaverse, this article aims to contribute to the debate in the literature and discusses possible policy solutions and approaches.

Interactive Entertainment Law ReviewVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.