An Exploratory Analysis of B-Corp Decertification Patterns

More than 4,000 firms worldwide have demonstrated a commitment to corporate social responsibility through B Corp certification, yet the drivers of B Corp decertification remain poorly understood. This study uses the B Corp Impact Data dataset and applies a two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression model to examine whether decertification stems from voluntary firm choice or failure to meet B Lab’s 80-point certification threshold. Findings show that firms with three or more successful certifications are more likely to decertify voluntarily, while those with fewer certifications may lack the knowledge or capacity to maintain certification. Results also indicate that firms with balanced performance across the five B Impact Assessment (BIA) categories—community, customers, environment, governance, and workers—are more likely to sustain certification. Firm size and score variability further influence outcomes. These findings highlight the value of supporting firms through at least three certification cycles and offer practical implications for B Lab. This research provides a reliable foundation for future studies investigating voluntary versus involuntary decertification within the global B Corp community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Management
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v25i3.7766
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploratory Analysis of B-Corp Decertification Patterns

Biff Baker, Kwabena Peprah
American Journal of Management
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

An Exploratory Analysis of B-Corp Decertification Patterns

Biff Baker, Kwabena Peprah
article en

Abstract

More than 4,000 firms worldwide have demonstrated a commitment to corporate social responsibility through B Corp certification, yet the drivers of B Corp decertification remain poorly understood. This study uses the B Corp Impact Data dataset and applies a two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression model to examine whether decertification stems from voluntary firm choice or failure to meet B Lab’s 80-point certification threshold. Findings show that firms with three or more successful certifications are more likely to decertify voluntarily, while those with fewer certifications may lack the knowledge or capacity to maintain certification. Results also indicate that firms with balanced performance across the five B Impact Assessment (BIA) categories—community, customers, environment, governance, and workers—are more likely to sustain certification. Firm size and score variability further influence outcomes. These findings highlight the value of supporting firms through at least three certification cycles and offer practical implications for B Lab. This research provides a reliable foundation for future studies investigating voluntary versus involuntary decertification within the global B Corp community.

American Journal of ManagementVol. 25(3)
Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Exploratory Analysis of B-Corp Decertification Patterns — Biff Baker, Kwabena Peprah · American Journal of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS