Extended Abstract: Accessible Abstracts: Mapping Publishers' Focus on Plain-Language Summaries, Graphic Abstracts, and Video Abstracts

Many scientific journals now require or recommend accessible, short synopses of articles, often authored by researchers themselves and aimed at non-specialized audiences. These accessible abstracts include primarily plain-language summaries, as well as graphic and video abstracts. Publishers claim these genres increase scope, access, and impact metrics of research. Despite the impacts of and wide demand for these genres, they are not well attended in technical and professional communication (TPC). Set against a synthesis of existing research on these three types of abstracts, this session introduces a 2-part study investigating how 10 top scientific publishers support these genres. Part one includes a content analysis of the goals, features, audiences, and recommendations described by publishers. Part two includes a companion rhetorical analysis of a subset of samples of each abstract type. This project delivers a picture of recent research on abstract-based approaches to communicating science. This analysis yields concrete and theoretical insights into the current status of this persistent approach to accessible science as a basis for further projects in TPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm64814.2025.00069
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended Abstract: Accessible Abstracts: Mapping Publishers' Focus on Plain-Language Summaries, Graphic Abstracts, and Video Abstracts

Kira Dreher
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

Extended Abstract: Accessible Abstracts: Mapping Publishers' Focus on Plain-Language Summaries, Graphic Abstracts, and Video Abstracts

Kira Dreher
article en

Abstract

Many scientific journals now require or recommend accessible, short synopses of articles, often authored by researchers themselves and aimed at non-specialized audiences. These accessible abstracts include primarily plain-language summaries, as well as graphic and video abstracts. Publishers claim these genres increase scope, access, and impact metrics of research. Despite the impacts of and wide demand for these genres, they are not well attended in technical and professional communication (TPC). Set against a synthesis of existing research on these three types of abstracts, this session introduces a 2-part study investigating how 10 top scientific publishers support these genres. Part one includes a content analysis of the goals, features, audiences, and recommendations described by publishers. Part two includes a companion rhetorical analysis of a subset of samples of each abstract type. This project delivers a picture of recent research on abstract-based approaches to communicating science. This analysis yields concrete and theoretical insights into the current status of this persistent approach to accessible science as a basis for further projects in TPC.

Carnegie Mellon University Qatar (QA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.