Mitigating Biased, Brittle and Baroque Generative AI

The rapid adoption of Generative AI across multiple use cases has introduced new risks and attack surfaces across a range of important applications. While the increasing competency of Large Language Models (LLMs) promises high value, responsible AI requires the mitigation of potentially biased, brittle, and baroque operations which undermine trust and carry the potential of causing harm. Moreover, active adversaries will exploit LLM weaknesses to undermine confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Encompassing a survey of current LLM performance and risk literature, this paper presents a framework for understanding the current state of the art and a complementary path forward. In particular, the framework enables designers, users, and policymakers to understand and assess categorized risks and suggests methods to mitigate weaknesses during design and deployment in order to create LLMs that are less likely to fail and more resilient to attacks. It also suggests methods to use existing but imperfect LLMs in a responsible manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icad65464.2025.11114038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating Biased, Brittle and Baroque Generative AI

Mark T. Maybury
1 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

Mitigating Biased, Brittle and Baroque Generative AI

Mark T. Maybury
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Generative AI across multiple use cases has introduced new risks and attack surfaces across a range of important applications. While the increasing competency of Large Language Models (LLMs) promises high value, responsible AI requires the mitigation of potentially biased, brittle, and baroque operations which undermine trust and carry the potential of causing harm. Moreover, active adversaries will exploit LLM weaknesses to undermine confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Encompassing a survey of current LLM performance and risk literature, this paper presents a framework for understanding the current state of the art and a complementary path forward. In particular, the framework enables designers, users, and policymakers to understand and assess categorized risks and suggests methods to mitigate weaknesses during design and deployment in order to create LLMs that are less likely to fail and more resilient to attacks. It also suggests methods to use existing but imperfect LLMs in a responsible manner.

Lockheed Martin (United States) (US), Lockheed Martin (Canada) (CA)
Lockheed Martin
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mitigating Biased, Brittle and Baroque Generative AI — Mark T. Maybury · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS