Do Chatbots Dream of Data Streams? Play, Creativity, Personhood, and Generative AI in Engineering Communication

This Brief Paper discusses emerging trends from an ongoing study of how undergraduate engineering students at a midwest R1 university engage with Generative AI (GenAI) technologies and how these interactions influence their creative and ethical approaches to engineering work. Using survey data and interviews from fourteen students, initial findings reveal that students often began using GenAI experimentally, with the goals of having fun and testing its capabilities. In doing so, they unintentionally engage in the engineering practice of finding problems in need of solutions. This paper further examines students' ethical concerns related to authorship, accountability, and the ownership of ideas generated by GenAI. Although a human-in-the-loop approach is prevalent, where students critically incorporate GenAI into their learning, writing, and engineering practices, concerns around over-reliance and the ethical implications of GenAI's lack of personhood complicate their relationships with GenAI. This paper underscores the need for further exploration of ethics and creativity in GenAI use, as these novice engineers navigate the evolving network of technology in engineering education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm64814.2025.00053
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Chatbots Dream of Data Streams? Play, Creativity, Personhood, and Generative AI in Engineering Communication

CL Hart, Clay Walker, Mariel Krupansky
AI in Service Interactions
article

Do Chatbots Dream of Data Streams? Play, Creativity, Personhood, and Generative AI in Engineering Communication

CL Hart, Clay Walker, Mariel Krupansky
article en

Abstract

This Brief Paper discusses emerging trends from an ongoing study of how undergraduate engineering students at a midwest R1 university engage with Generative AI (GenAI) technologies and how these interactions influence their creative and ethical approaches to engineering work. Using survey data and interviews from fourteen students, initial findings reveal that students often began using GenAI experimentally, with the goals of having fun and testing its capabilities. In doing so, they unintentionally engage in the engineering practice of finding problems in need of solutions. This paper further examines students' ethical concerns related to authorship, accountability, and the ownership of ideas generated by GenAI. Although a human-in-the-loop approach is prevalent, where students critically incorporate GenAI into their learning, writing, and engineering practices, concerns around over-reliance and the ethical implications of GenAI's lack of personhood complicate their relationships with GenAI. This paper underscores the need for further exploration of ethics and creativity in GenAI use, as these novice engineers navigate the evolving network of technology in engineering education.

University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Chatbots Dream of Data Streams? Play, Creativity, Personhood, and Generative AI in Engineering Communication — CL Hart, Clay Walker, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS