Automating Explanation Need Management in App Reviews: A Case Study from the Navigation App Industry

Providing explanations in response to user reviews is a time-consuming and repetitive task for companies, as many reviews present similar issues requiring nearly identical responses. To improve efficiency, this paper proposes a semi-automated approach to managing explanation needs in user reviews. The approach leverages taxonomy categories to classify reviews and assign them to relevant internal teams or sources for responses. 2,366 app reviews from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store were scraped and analyzed using a word and phrase filtering system to detect explanation needs. The detected needs were categorized and assigned to specific internal teams at the company Graphmasters GmbH, using a hierarchical assignment strategy that prioritizes the most relevant teams. Additionally, external sources, such as existing support articles and past review responses, were integrated to provide comprehensive explanations. The system was evaluated through interviews and surveys with the Graphmasters support team, which consists of four employees. The results showed that the hierarchical assignment method improved the accuracy of team assignments, with correct teams being identified in 79.2% of cases. However, challenges in interrater agreement and the need for new responses in certain cases, particularly for Apple App Store reviews, were noted. Future work will focus on refining the taxonomy and enhancing the automation process to reduce manual intervention further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seip66354.2025.00063
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Explanation Need Management in App Reviews: A Case Study from the Navigation App Industry

Jannik Fischbach, Marc Herrmann, Martin Obaidi, Kurt Schneider et al.
7 citations
Scientific Computing and Data Management
29.18
article

Automating Explanation Need Management in App Reviews: A Case Study from the Navigation App Industry

Jannik Fischbach, Marc Herrmann, Martin Obaidi, Kurt Schneider, Hannah Deters, Jakob Droste, Nicolas Voß
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Providing explanations in response to user reviews is a time-consuming and repetitive task for companies, as many reviews present similar issues requiring nearly identical responses. To improve efficiency, this paper proposes a semi-automated approach to managing explanation needs in user reviews. The approach leverages taxonomy categories to classify reviews and assign them to relevant internal teams or sources for responses. 2,366 app reviews from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store were scraped and analyzed using a word and phrase filtering system to detect explanation needs. The detected needs were categorized and assigned to specific internal teams at the company Graphmasters GmbH, using a hierarchical assignment strategy that prioritizes the most relevant teams. Additionally, external sources, such as existing support articles and past review responses, were integrated to provide comprehensive explanations. The system was evaluated through interviews and surveys with the Graphmasters support team, which consists of four employees. The results showed that the hierarchical assignment method improved the accuracy of team assignments, with correct teams being identified in 79.2% of cases. However, challenges in interrater agreement and the need for new responses in certain cases, particularly for Apple App Store reviews, were noted. Future work will focus on refining the taxonomy and enhancing the automation process to reduce manual intervention further.

Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover (DE), Fortiss (DE), L3S Research Center (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
29.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.