Code Mixing Used by Tutors at Bananaina English Course

The investigation centers on tutors’ code-mixing at Bananaina English Course during 2023–2024. The objectives encompass discerning code-mixing variants employed by instructors and unraveling their underlying motivations. This inquiry adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, spotlighting three English educators. Data collection entailed interviews, direct observation, and audio documentation, then interpreted through Muysken’s (2000) and Hoffmann’s (1991) frameworks. Findings reveal alternation code-mixing predominated (53%, 84 utterances), followed by insertion (28%, 45 utterances) and congruent lexicalization (19%, 31 utterances). Tutors engaged in code-mixing chiefly to elucidate concepts and foster rapport. Examining code-mixing illuminates linguistic adaptation in diverse settings and enriches comprehension of language acquisition in multilingual milieus. Such insights may refine pedagogical strategies in heterogeneous classrooms. Moreover, code-mixing research elucidates the psychological and sociocultural dimensions of linguistic variation, shedding light on dynamics of power, identity, and communicative norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Education and Literature Journal (E-jou)
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i02.1555
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Code Mixing Used by Tutors at Bananaina English Course

Andrian Nuriza Johan, Tri Hartina
English Education and Literature Journal (E-jou)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Code Mixing Used by Tutors at Bananaina English Course

Andrian Nuriza Johan, Tri Hartina
article en

Abstract

The investigation centers on tutors’ code-mixing at Bananaina English Course during 2023–2024. The objectives encompass discerning code-mixing variants employed by instructors and unraveling their underlying motivations. This inquiry adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, spotlighting three English educators. Data collection entailed interviews, direct observation, and audio documentation, then interpreted through Muysken’s (2000) and Hoffmann’s (1991) frameworks. Findings reveal alternation code-mixing predominated (53%, 84 utterances), followed by insertion (28%, 45 utterances) and congruent lexicalization (19%, 31 utterances). Tutors engaged in code-mixing chiefly to elucidate concepts and foster rapport. Examining code-mixing illuminates linguistic adaptation in diverse settings and enriches comprehension of language acquisition in multilingual milieus. Such insights may refine pedagogical strategies in heterogeneous classrooms. Moreover, code-mixing research elucidates the psychological and sociocultural dimensions of linguistic variation, shedding light on dynamics of power, identity, and communicative norms.

English Education and Literature Journal (E-jou)Vol. 5(02)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Code Mixing Used by Tutors at Bananaina English Course — Andrian Nuriza Johan, Tri Hartina · English Education and Literature Journal (E-jou) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS