Round Robin Analysis of Uranium Isotopics on Cotton Swipes Measured Using Microextraction-Based Sampling Versus Conventional Bulk Analysis

A comparison of microextraction sampling methods to directly analyze uranium isotopics on cotton swipes was performed concurrently with traditional bulk-processing methods. For the microextraction sampling approach, two different detection platforms were evaluated, a quadrupole-based inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) and the liquid sampling-atmospheric pressure glow discharge (LS-APGD) coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Results presented from this innovative sampling approach (i.e., microextraction) are compared with a more traditional approach employed for analysis of cotton-based environmental swipes, namely bulk ashing/digestion, separation, and subsequent analysis by high-precision multi-collector ICP-MS. Overall, the microextraction approach proved to be a reliable and accurate means to determine isotopic ratios of uranium collected on cotton swipes. The ICP-MS-based detection had relative standard deviations of <0.65% for the major isotopic determinations, whereas the LS-APGD-Orbitrap method had relative standard deviations of <3%. The percent relative difference for the 235 U/ 238 U ratios, in comparison to the expected values, was <1% for ICP-MS and <4% for the microplasma-Orbitrap method. Additionally, the microextraction ICP-MS accurately (<2%) and precisely (<5%) determined the minor isotopic compositions (i.e., 234 U/ 238 U and 236 U/ 238 U).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Spectroscopy Practica
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27551857251367770
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Round Robin Analysis of Uranium Isotopics on Cotton Swipes Measured Using Microextraction-Based Sampling Versus Conventional Bulk Analysis

R. Kenneth Marcus, Benjamin T. Manard, Daniel R. Dunlap, Veronica C. Bradley et al.
Applied Spectroscopy Practica
Radioactive contamination and transfer
article

Round Robin Analysis of Uranium Isotopics on Cotton Swipes Measured Using Microextraction-Based Sampling Versus Conventional Bulk Analysis

R. Kenneth Marcus, Benjamin T. Manard, Daniel R. Dunlap, Veronica C. Bradley, Shalina C. Metzger, Joseph V. Goodwin, Hunter B. Andrews, N. Alex Zirakparvar, Cole R. Hexel, Brian W. Ticknor, Melissa Adkisson
article en

Abstract

A comparison of microextraction sampling methods to directly analyze uranium isotopics on cotton swipes was performed concurrently with traditional bulk-processing methods. For the microextraction sampling approach, two different detection platforms were evaluated, a quadrupole-based inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) and the liquid sampling-atmospheric pressure glow discharge (LS-APGD) coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Results presented from this innovative sampling approach (i.e., microextraction) are compared with a more traditional approach employed for analysis of cotton-based environmental swipes, namely bulk ashing/digestion, separation, and subsequent analysis by high-precision multi-collector ICP-MS. Overall, the microextraction approach proved to be a reliable and accurate means to determine isotopic ratios of uranium collected on cotton swipes. The ICP-MS-based detection had relative standard deviations of <0.65% for the major isotopic determinations, whereas the LS-APGD-Orbitrap method had relative standard deviations of <3%. The percent relative difference for the 235 U/ 238 U ratios, in comparison to the expected values, was <1% for ICP-MS and <4% for the microplasma-Orbitrap method. Additionally, the microextraction ICP-MS accurately (<2%) and precisely (<5%) determined the minor isotopic compositions (i.e., 234 U/ 238 U and 236 U/ 238 U).

Applied Spectroscopy PracticaVol. 3(3)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.