5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries

This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (S<sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (S<sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both "background" exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average S<sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum S<sub>max,</sub> <sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest S<sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest S<sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest S<sub>max,</sub> <sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (-4.8 to -10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioelectromagnetics
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70019
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries

Martin Röösli, Wout Joseph, David Plets, Adriana Fernandes Veludo et al.
3 citations
Bioelectromagnetics
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
4.90
article

5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries

Martin Röösli, Wout Joseph, David Plets, Adriana Fernandes Veludo, György Thuróczy, Péter Pál Necz, Piotr Politański, Kenneth Deprez, Leen Verloock, Bram Stroobandt, Zsuzsanna Vecsei, Kinga Polańska
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (S<sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (S<sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both "background" exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average S<sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum S<sub>max,</sub> <sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest S<sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest S<sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest S<sub>max,</sub> <sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (-4.8 to -10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.

BioelectromagneticsVol. 46(6)
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Basel (CH), Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine (PL), Ghent University (BE), National Public Health and Medical Officer Service (HU)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
4.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.