Foundry Sand in Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Environmental Performance, Contamination Risks, and Regulatory Frameworks

The significant expansion of the construction sector and corresponding depletion of natural sand resources have intensified the search for sustainable alternatives, with waste foundry sand (WFS) emerging as a promising candidate. This systematic review evaluates the environmental performance and engineering feasibility of using WFS as a substitute for natural sand in construction. A PRISMA-guided search identified 152 peer-reviewed studies published between 2001 and 2024, which were categorized into four thematic areas: material characterization, construction applications, environmental impacts, and regulatory frameworks. The findings indicate that substituting 10–30% of natural sand with WFS in concrete and asphalt can deliver compressive strength within ±5% of control mixes and reduce water absorption by 5–15% at optimal replacement levels. However, contamination risks remain a concern, as chromium and copper concentrations in raw WFS have been reported at up to 931 mg/kg and 3318 mg/kg, respectively. To address these risks and ensure responsible reuse, a six-stage framework is proposed in this study, comprising end-of-waste classification, contaminant assessment, material preprocessing, certification, and regulatory monitoring. A comprehensive decision tree is also presented to guide the feasibility assessment of WFS reuse based on contaminant levels and material performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction Materials
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater5030057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Materials Engineering and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foundry Sand in Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Environmental Performance, Contamination Risks, and Regulatory Frameworks

Aurobindo Ogra, Ntebo Ngcobo, Ferdinand Niyonyungu
1 citations
Construction Materials
Materials Engineering and Processing
0.71
article

Foundry Sand in Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Environmental Performance, Contamination Risks, and Regulatory Frameworks

Aurobindo Ogra, Ntebo Ngcobo, Ferdinand Niyonyungu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The significant expansion of the construction sector and corresponding depletion of natural sand resources have intensified the search for sustainable alternatives, with waste foundry sand (WFS) emerging as a promising candidate. This systematic review evaluates the environmental performance and engineering feasibility of using WFS as a substitute for natural sand in construction. A PRISMA-guided search identified 152 peer-reviewed studies published between 2001 and 2024, which were categorized into four thematic areas: material characterization, construction applications, environmental impacts, and regulatory frameworks. The findings indicate that substituting 10–30% of natural sand with WFS in concrete and asphalt can deliver compressive strength within ±5% of control mixes and reduce water absorption by 5–15% at optimal replacement levels. However, contamination risks remain a concern, as chromium and copper concentrations in raw WFS have been reported at up to 931 mg/kg and 3318 mg/kg, respectively. To address these risks and ensure responsible reuse, a six-stage framework is proposed in this study, comprising end-of-waste classification, contaminant assessment, material preprocessing, certification, and regulatory monitoring. A comprehensive decision tree is also presented to guide the feasibility assessment of WFS reuse based on contaminant levels and material performance.

Construction MaterialsVol. 5(3)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Materials Engineering and Processing
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.