Beyond Singularity and Fragmentation: A Dynamic and Integrative Model for Explaining Public Sector Innovation

ABSTRACT Public sector innovation (PSI) is crucial for improving the quality and effectiveness of public services. Existing studies related to PSI influencing factors are fragmented and mostly focused on a certain stage, such as the adoption or implementation stage. However, PSI is a dynamic process influenced by different types of factors at different stages. As such, this paper constructs a framework integrating the MSF and TOE frameworks to explain PSI, and then tests it through an in‐depth case study of City J in China. The findings reveal that the antecedents of PSI evolve as innovation progresses. We further discuss the connections or interactions among these antecedents. The managerial implication of this study is to shed light on the dynamic and systematic nature of PSI, guiding practitioners in strategically allocating resources across different innovation stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70017
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Singularity and Fragmentation: A Dynamic and Integrative Model for Explaining Public Sector Innovation

Ziteng Fan, Yingying Gao, Haibo Tan, Lihua Yang
Public Administration and Development
E-Government and Public Services
article

Beyond Singularity and Fragmentation: A Dynamic and Integrative Model for Explaining Public Sector Innovation

Ziteng Fan, Yingying Gao, Haibo Tan, Lihua Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public sector innovation (PSI) is crucial for improving the quality and effectiveness of public services. Existing studies related to PSI influencing factors are fragmented and mostly focused on a certain stage, such as the adoption or implementation stage. However, PSI is a dynamic process influenced by different types of factors at different stages. As such, this paper constructs a framework integrating the MSF and TOE frameworks to explain PSI, and then tests it through an in‐depth case study of City J in China. The findings reveal that the antecedents of PSI evolve as innovation progresses. We further discuss the connections or interactions among these antecedents. The managerial implication of this study is to shed light on the dynamic and systematic nature of PSI, guiding practitioners in strategically allocating resources across different innovation stages.

Public Administration and DevelopmentVol. 45(5)
Institute on Governance (CA), Hunan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.