Evaluating the Accuracy of AI-Powered Ergonomic Assessments Using a Commercial Computer Vision System

Workers performing material handling tasks are at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). While AI-based computer vision tools claim to assess ergonomic risks with minimal input, their accuracy remains uncertain. This study evaluated a commercial AI system’s ability to estimate key parameters of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) by comparing its outputs to those from a marker-based motion capture system. Ten participants completed lifting tasks while being recorded by three cameras and motion capture sensors. The AI-analyzed video outputs were compared to ground truth data. Results showed significant inaccuracies in the AI’s estimates—especially for horizontal and vertical distances—leading to overestimated Recommended Weight Limits and underestimated Lifting Index values. Among the camera views, the side view produced the most accurate results, while the moving camera performed worst. These findings highlight the need for improvement in commercial AI tools before they can be reliably used in ergonomic risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251367005
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Accuracy of AI-Powered Ergonomic Assessments Using a Commercial Computer Vision System

Sunwook Kim, Sol Lim, Saman Jamshid Nezhad Zahabi
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Evaluating the Accuracy of AI-Powered Ergonomic Assessments Using a Commercial Computer Vision System

Sunwook Kim, Sol Lim, Saman Jamshid Nezhad Zahabi
article en

Abstract

Workers performing material handling tasks are at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). While AI-based computer vision tools claim to assess ergonomic risks with minimal input, their accuracy remains uncertain. This study evaluated a commercial AI system’s ability to estimate key parameters of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) by comparing its outputs to those from a marker-based motion capture system. Ten participants completed lifting tasks while being recorded by three cameras and motion capture sensors. The AI-analyzed video outputs were compared to ground truth data. Results showed significant inaccuracies in the AI’s estimates—especially for horizontal and vertical distances—leading to overestimated Recommended Weight Limits and underestimated Lifting Index values. Among the camera views, the side view produced the most accurate results, while the moving camera performed worst. These findings highlight the need for improvement in commercial AI tools before they can be reliably used in ergonomic risk assessments.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Virginia Tech (US)
General Motors Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the Accuracy of AI-Powered Ergonomic Assessments Using a Commercial Computer Vision System — Sunwook Kim, Sol Lim, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS