Participant Observation and Academic Disablement: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Experiences of Disabled Scholars

Using the social model of disability, this duoethnographic exploration allows readers a glimpse of how disabled scholars navigated participant observation as a method. In doing so, we highlight issues of accessibility at the intersections of two similar but different identity markers. The first author, a woman, experiences inaccessibility as a blind scholar. The second author, a man, experiences inaccessibility because of cerebral palsy. We foreground how research methods often assume normative abilities. We also forge a path to make participant observation more inclusive for disabled scholars. Together, we discuss both the obstacles embedded within current methods and potential solutions, concluding with recommendations for fostering greater accessibility in fieldwork and participant observation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251364541
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participant Observation and Academic Disablement: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Experiences of Disabled Scholars

Kendal Lyssy, Evan Kirksey
1 citations
Qualitative Inquiry
Disability Education and Employment
2.37
article

Participant Observation and Academic Disablement: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Experiences of Disabled Scholars

Kendal Lyssy, Evan Kirksey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using the social model of disability, this duoethnographic exploration allows readers a glimpse of how disabled scholars navigated participant observation as a method. In doing so, we highlight issues of accessibility at the intersections of two similar but different identity markers. The first author, a woman, experiences inaccessibility as a blind scholar. The second author, a man, experiences inaccessibility because of cerebral palsy. We foreground how research methods often assume normative abilities. We also forge a path to make participant observation more inclusive for disabled scholars. Together, we discuss both the obstacles embedded within current methods and potential solutions, concluding with recommendations for fostering greater accessibility in fieldwork and participant observation.

Qualitative Inquiry
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Disability Education and Employment
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.