Beyond a Negativity Bias: Explaining the Consumption of Positive and Negative Political Information Using WebTracking and Experience Sampling Data

Negativity and positivity are crucial in political information, yet research often overlooks positive content consumption. This study examines the degree to which citizens consume positive and negative election-related content and the factors influencing both. Using web-tracking and experience sampling (mobile intensive longitudinal linkage analysis [MILLA]) data from the 2021 German federal election, we find positivity and negativity are equally relevant but vary across channels and methods of data collection. In tracking data, gender and conflict approach predict valence preference, while MILLA data highlight perceived duty, extreme ideology, and conflict approach. Possible interpretations of these systematic differences and their general relevance for communication research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251359658
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond a Negativity Bias: Explaining the Consumption of Positive and Negative Political Information Using WebTracking and Experience Sampling Data

Felix Schmidt, Jürgen Maier, Michaela Maier, Lea C. Gorski
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Social Media and Politics
article

Beyond a Negativity Bias: Explaining the Consumption of Positive and Negative Political Information Using WebTracking and Experience Sampling Data

Felix Schmidt, Jürgen Maier, Michaela Maier, Lea C. Gorski
article en

Abstract

Negativity and positivity are crucial in political information, yet research often overlooks positive content consumption. This study examines the degree to which citizens consume positive and negative election-related content and the factors influencing both. Using web-tracking and experience sampling (mobile intensive longitudinal linkage analysis [MILLA]) data from the 2021 German federal election, we find positivity and negativity are equally relevant but vary across channels and methods of data collection. In tracking data, gender and conflict approach predict valence preference, while MILLA data highlight perceived duty, extreme ideology, and conflict approach. Possible interpretations of these systematic differences and their general relevance for communication research are discussed.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.