‘IT’S ALWAYS BEST TO SORT OF SPEAK UP, BUT…’ silence and the (im)possibility of resistance to racist reactions to ‘affirmative action’ in a university context

Programmes designed to support Indigenous (Māori) and marginalised (Pasifika) students to participate and succeed at (our) university are well-established, yet continue to meet challenge and resistance. As supporters and a participant in these programmes, we wanted to explore the possibility of speaking up and against (racist) resistance to programmes designed to make the university a more equitable and inclusive space. We sought to explore how those who supported such programmes would engage with, and respond to – or not – expressions of racist resistance. We aimed to find answers and solutions, strategies to melt resistance away. We used a qualitative interview design within a critical realist theoretical position and heavily informed by Kaupapa Māori research principles. Twenty participants were recruited carefully, and analysis used reflexive thematic analysis. Our first theme captured a strong moral imperative to challenge opposition to equity programmes, with silence representing complicity and a failed moral duty to improve the world. Theme two discussed anti-equity sentiment as harmful, particularly to Māori and Pasifika students. Theme three focused on emotion: anger was rendered a justified yet unhelpful emotion to express in discussions of equity programmes, while rationality was positioned as positive and useful. Theme four centred around futility, with participants suggesting responding to anti-equity expressions as highly unlikely to be successful, even if tackled ‘calmly’ and ‘rationally’. Students articulated a complex, fraught, and even impossible position in relation to speaking up, and challenging racist resistance. Given the impossibility of being a ‘speaking subject’ who can effectively challenge racism, participants felt the university needed to ‘lead from above’ to create a space and place in which resistance to such social-justice-based initiatives was not articulable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Futures in Education
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103251370294
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘IT’S ALWAYS BEST TO SORT OF SPEAK UP, BUT…’ silence and the (im)possibility of resistance to racist reactions to ‘affirmative action’ in a university context

Virginia Braun, Lucy Cowie
Policy Futures in Education
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

‘IT’S ALWAYS BEST TO SORT OF SPEAK UP, BUT…’ silence and the (im)possibility of resistance to racist reactions to ‘affirmative action’ in a university context

Virginia Braun, Lucy Cowie
article en

Abstract

Programmes designed to support Indigenous (Māori) and marginalised (Pasifika) students to participate and succeed at (our) university are well-established, yet continue to meet challenge and resistance. As supporters and a participant in these programmes, we wanted to explore the possibility of speaking up and against (racist) resistance to programmes designed to make the university a more equitable and inclusive space. We sought to explore how those who supported such programmes would engage with, and respond to – or not – expressions of racist resistance. We aimed to find answers and solutions, strategies to melt resistance away. We used a qualitative interview design within a critical realist theoretical position and heavily informed by Kaupapa Māori research principles. Twenty participants were recruited carefully, and analysis used reflexive thematic analysis. Our first theme captured a strong moral imperative to challenge opposition to equity programmes, with silence representing complicity and a failed moral duty to improve the world. Theme two discussed anti-equity sentiment as harmful, particularly to Māori and Pasifika students. Theme three focused on emotion: anger was rendered a justified yet unhelpful emotion to express in discussions of equity programmes, while rationality was positioned as positive and useful. Theme four centred around futility, with participants suggesting responding to anti-equity expressions as highly unlikely to be successful, even if tackled ‘calmly’ and ‘rationally’. Students articulated a complex, fraught, and even impossible position in relation to speaking up, and challenging racist resistance. Given the impossibility of being a ‘speaking subject’ who can effectively challenge racism, participants felt the university needed to ‘lead from above’ to create a space and place in which resistance to such social-justice-based initiatives was not articulable.

Policy Futures in Education
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘IT’S ALWAYS BEST TO SORT OF SPEAK UP, BUT…’ silence and the (im)possibility of resistance to racist reactions to ‘affirmative action’ in a university context — Virginia Braun, Lucy Cowie · Policy Futures in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS