Gender (in)equity and the adoption of farm machinery: Opportunities and trade-offs in Bangladesh livestock systems

Agricultural mechanization can improve wellbeing and livelihoods in agrifood systems, but its benefits may not be evenly shared between women and men. This is a concern given the increased interest in agricultural mechanization in development programs. In this study, we analyzed data from 373 livestock producers in Bangladesh to assess the associations between adopting mechanized fodder choppers and gendered time-allocation, participation in decision-making, and control over livestock income. Accounting for observed heterogeneity between adopters and non-adopters, we find that the use of mechanized fodder choppers was associated with husbands claiming more influence over the use of livestock income. Adoption was also correlated with women’s time savings in livestock production, which they used for additional resting. While the associations in this study should not be interpreted as causal relationships, we conclude that the gendered outcomes of the adoption of mechanized fodder choppers can be complex. Development programs promoting farm machinery may need to consider ways that allow women to capture benefits while employing safeguards to prevent a potential weakening of women’s agency in livestock production. • Agricultural mechanization may not offer equal benefits for women and men. • Associations between farm machinery use and gender roles in livestock production. • Men tend to claim more influence over livestock income when using farm machinery. • Machinery use is associated with women’s time savings and additional resting time. • Need for safeguards to prevent weakening of women’s agency in livestock production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103839
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender (in)equity and the adoption of farm machinery: Opportunities and trade-offs in Bangladesh livestock systems

Santiago López‐Ridaura, Stephanie Cheesman, Farah Deba Keya, Michael Euler et al.
4 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
7.61
article

Gender (in)equity and the adoption of farm machinery: Opportunities and trade-offs in Bangladesh livestock systems

Santiago López‐Ridaura, Stephanie Cheesman, Farah Deba Keya, Michael Euler, Timothy Joseph Krupnik, Mizanur Rahman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Agricultural mechanization can improve wellbeing and livelihoods in agrifood systems, but its benefits may not be evenly shared between women and men. This is a concern given the increased interest in agricultural mechanization in development programs. In this study, we analyzed data from 373 livestock producers in Bangladesh to assess the associations between adopting mechanized fodder choppers and gendered time-allocation, participation in decision-making, and control over livestock income. Accounting for observed heterogeneity between adopters and non-adopters, we find that the use of mechanized fodder choppers was associated with husbands claiming more influence over the use of livestock income. Adoption was also correlated with women’s time savings in livestock production, which they used for additional resting. While the associations in this study should not be interpreted as causal relationships, we conclude that the gendered outcomes of the adoption of mechanized fodder choppers can be complex. Development programs promoting farm machinery may need to consider ways that allow women to capture benefits while employing safeguards to prevent a potential weakening of women’s agency in livestock production. • Agricultural mechanization may not offer equal benefits for women and men. • Associations between farm machinery use and gender roles in livestock production. • Men tend to claim more influence over livestock income when using farm machinery. • Machinery use is associated with women’s time savings and additional resting time. • Need for safeguards to prevent weakening of women’s agency in livestock production.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 120
Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (ET), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (BD)
United States Agency for International Development
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
7.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.