Material and waste reduction through industrialised building: A systematic and meta-analysis review

• Industrialised building significantly reduce construction waste on average. • Industrialised building show negligible impact on material use on average. • Waste and material use savings in buildings vary significantly. • Full life cycle assessments are crucial for accurate results. • Standardised reporting is essential for more robust comparisons . Despite growing interest, the relative advantages of industrialised building (IB) over traditional building (TB) remain unclear in the literature. While some studies suggest that IB offers resource efficiency advantages, others show that it often results in increased material use and waste generation. This study contributes to clarifying this issue through a meta -analysis review, focusing on articles that use data from real projects that report clear scopes and system boundaries. This approach seeks to ensure the reliability and practical relevance of the findings, providing insights into the real-world performance of IB and TB, and the influence that different variables and factors can provide when comparing them. A total of 62 cases were extracted from database queries covering publications from 2008 to 2023. Material use and waste savings were examined across various dimensions, including country, building type, and specific construction products, systems and materials. The results show that, on average, IB methods have a negligible impact on material use (median 0.0%) and a substantial waste reduction potential (median 36.5%). Findings confirm that IB can enable significant waste reduction in various construction materials, particularly in the case of steel, timber and gypsum plastering, thus holding potential to minimise the environmental impacts of the industry. This study further argues the need for standardised reporting procedures in future case studies, including disclosure of IB typologies implemented, consistent use of functional units, and the inclusion of more life cycle stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116330
Citations
2
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material and waste reduction through industrialised building: A systematic and meta-analysis review

Santiago Muñoz, Duncan Maxwell, Victor Bunster, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli
2 citations
Energy and Buildings
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
article

Material and waste reduction through industrialised building: A systematic and meta-analysis review

Santiago Muñoz, Duncan Maxwell, Victor Bunster, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Industrialised building significantly reduce construction waste on average. • Industrialised building show negligible impact on material use on average. • Waste and material use savings in buildings vary significantly. • Full life cycle assessments are crucial for accurate results. • Standardised reporting is essential for more robust comparisons . Despite growing interest, the relative advantages of industrialised building (IB) over traditional building (TB) remain unclear in the literature. While some studies suggest that IB offers resource efficiency advantages, others show that it often results in increased material use and waste generation. This study contributes to clarifying this issue through a meta -analysis review, focusing on articles that use data from real projects that report clear scopes and system boundaries. This approach seeks to ensure the reliability and practical relevance of the findings, providing insights into the real-world performance of IB and TB, and the influence that different variables and factors can provide when comparing them. A total of 62 cases were extracted from database queries covering publications from 2008 to 2023. Material use and waste savings were examined across various dimensions, including country, building type, and specific construction products, systems and materials. The results show that, on average, IB methods have a negligible impact on material use (median 0.0%) and a substantial waste reduction potential (median 36.5%). Findings confirm that IB can enable significant waste reduction in various construction materials, particularly in the case of steel, timber and gypsum plastering, thus holding potential to minimise the environmental impacts of the industry. This study further argues the need for standardised reporting procedures in future case studies, including disclosure of IB typologies implemented, consistent use of functional units, and the inclusion of more life cycle stages.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 347
Caulfield Hospital (AU), Monash University (AU)
Sustainability Victoria
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.