Investigation of Studies on ChatGPT's Ability to Answer Anatomy Questions: A Self-Evaluation by ChatGPT and Comparison with an Evaluation by Gemini
ChatGPT and Gemini generated reliable responses only when they were simply asked to detect studies about ChatGPT's ability to answer anatomy questions. They particularly struggled to locate and outline comparative studies. While Gemini performed generally better, it hallucinated and exhibited bias against ChatGPT. Ongoing evolution may enhance ChatGPT and Gemini's potential to contribute to anatomical research.
Authors
- George Noussios (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-9461)
- Theodore G. Troupis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3676-4486)
- Angelo V. Vasiliadis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-8898)
- Dimitrios Chytas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-7121)
- Marios Salmas
Institutions
- University of Peloponnese (GR)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- St. Luke's Hospital (GR)
- Athens State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90572
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.65