Diversification of intensive maize production with undersowings reveals taxon-specific biodiversity-yield trade-offs

Diversified cropping systems are an important strategy in the agro-ecological transformation process to increase biodiversity and agricultural productivity. Maize ( Zea mays L.) is an economically important crop, but is associated with high environmental costs and low biodiversity. Undersowing maize can mitigate the effects of intensive maize cultivation and provide additional resources for arthropods. However, competition between maize and undersowings can reduce maize yield substantially. In a field experiment, we investigated how diversifying maize with six different undersowings (fescue, cress, clover, vetch, mallow, marigold-borage) effects pollinating insects, predatory arthropods, potential pest control and yield compared to mono-maize and mono-undersowings. Undersowing maize showed clear improvements over mono-maize with up to 10 times more pollinator individuals and up to two times more predatory arthropods, but there was no single undersown species that benefited all groups equally. Yield reductions ranged from 15 – 65 % in mixed versus mono-maize. Undersowing maize with flowering species promoted pollinating insects but at high cost to yield, displaying a high biodiversity yield trade-off, while pest predation was maintained across the observed yield range. Thus, pollinators may be more effectively supported by measures outside the maize field while predatory arthropods benefit from within-field diversification with small-growing legumes and grasses, which caused less yield reduction. Considering the biodiversity-yield trade-off is an important aspect to increase farmers’ acceptance to diversify high performing maize. Among several innovative tools to promote agro-ecological transformation at the landscape scale, undersowing in maize may be an important one, but validation across multiple independent sites should be pursued. • Undersowings support biodiversity but reduce maize yields by 15 – 65 %. • Flowering undersowings benefit pollinating insects but at a high costs to yield. • Predatory arthropods benefit from within-field diversification through undersowing. • Pest predation potential can be maintained over the observed yield range. • Undersowing maize may promote agro-ecological transformation at the landscape scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109920
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversification of intensive maize production with undersowings reveals taxon-specific biodiversity-yield trade-offs

Doreen Gabriel, Frank Höppner, Vera Wersebeckmann
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Diversification of intensive maize production with undersowings reveals taxon-specific biodiversity-yield trade-offs

Doreen Gabriel, Frank Höppner, Vera Wersebeckmann
article en

Abstract

Diversified cropping systems are an important strategy in the agro-ecological transformation process to increase biodiversity and agricultural productivity. Maize ( Zea mays L.) is an economically important crop, but is associated with high environmental costs and low biodiversity. Undersowing maize can mitigate the effects of intensive maize cultivation and provide additional resources for arthropods. However, competition between maize and undersowings can reduce maize yield substantially. In a field experiment, we investigated how diversifying maize with six different undersowings (fescue, cress, clover, vetch, mallow, marigold-borage) effects pollinating insects, predatory arthropods, potential pest control and yield compared to mono-maize and mono-undersowings. Undersowing maize showed clear improvements over mono-maize with up to 10 times more pollinator individuals and up to two times more predatory arthropods, but there was no single undersown species that benefited all groups equally. Yield reductions ranged from 15 – 65 % in mixed versus mono-maize. Undersowing maize with flowering species promoted pollinating insects but at high cost to yield, displaying a high biodiversity yield trade-off, while pest predation was maintained across the observed yield range. Thus, pollinators may be more effectively supported by measures outside the maize field while predatory arthropods benefit from within-field diversification with small-growing legumes and grasses, which caused less yield reduction. Considering the biodiversity-yield trade-off is an important aspect to increase farmers’ acceptance to diversify high performing maize. Among several innovative tools to promote agro-ecological transformation at the landscape scale, undersowing in maize may be an important one, but validation across multiple independent sites should be pursued. • Undersowings support biodiversity but reduce maize yields by 15 – 65 %. • Flowering undersowings benefit pollinating insects but at a high costs to yield. • Predatory arthropods benefit from within-field diversification through undersowing. • Pest predation potential can be maintained over the observed yield range. • Undersowing maize may promote agro-ecological transformation at the landscape scale.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 394
Julius Kühn-Institut (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.