The resource hypothesis revisited: Analysing the OECD experience in energy sustainability

This study examines the impact of natural resource wealth on energy sustainability, with a particular focus on the moderating role of government environmental protection expenditure (GEPE). Using data from 30 OECD countries spanning 2000–2022, the analysis employs advanced econometric methods including Driscoll-Kraay (DK) standard errors, the Instrumental Variable Generalised Method of Moments (IV-GMM), and the Dynamic Panel Threshold Regression (DPTR) model. The findings reveal a nuanced relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Initially, resource wealth exhibits a negative correlation with energy sustainability. However, beyond a critical threshold of 35.2 %, this relationship reverses and becomes positive. This turning point underscores the dual nature of natural resource wealth, which can act as either a curse or a blessing, depending on how effectively it is managed and the scale of revenues it generates. The results demonstrate a U-shape relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Furthermore, the study finds that when natural resource wealth interacts with GEPE, it positively impacts energy sustainability. Based on these findings, policymakers should focus on increasing allocations to GEPE to fund renewable energy projects and enhance energy sustainability while establishing robust governance frameworks to manage resources wealth efficiently. • Objective : This study scrutinizes government environmental protection expenditure (GEPE) impact on the relationship between natural resource wealth on energy sustainability. • Methodology : Methodologically, we employed Driscoll and Kraay (DK) standard errors, the Instrumental Variable Generalised Method of Moments (IVGMM), and the Dynamic Panel Threshold Regression (DPTP) model. • Principal results : The findings indicate that, resource wealth exhibits a negative correlation with energy sustainability initially. However, beyond a critical threshold of 35.2 % this relationship reverses, becoming positive. This turning point underscores the dual nature of natural resource wealth, which can act as either a curse or a blessing, depending on how effectively it is managed and the scale of revenues it generates. The results demonstrate a U-shape relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Furthermore, the study finds that when natural resource wealth is combined with GEPE, it positively impacts energy sustainability. • Implications : Policymakers should focus on increasing allocations to GEPE to fund renewable energy projects and enhance energy sustainability while establishing robust governance frameworks to manage resources wealth efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114830
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The resource hypothesis revisited: Analysing the OECD experience in energy sustainability

Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka Wirajing, Germain Stephane Ketchoua
6 citations
Energy Policy
Natural Resources and Economic Development
18.51
article

The resource hypothesis revisited: Analysing the OECD experience in energy sustainability

Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka Wirajing, Germain Stephane Ketchoua
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study examines the impact of natural resource wealth on energy sustainability, with a particular focus on the moderating role of government environmental protection expenditure (GEPE). Using data from 30 OECD countries spanning 2000–2022, the analysis employs advanced econometric methods including Driscoll-Kraay (DK) standard errors, the Instrumental Variable Generalised Method of Moments (IV-GMM), and the Dynamic Panel Threshold Regression (DPTR) model. The findings reveal a nuanced relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Initially, resource wealth exhibits a negative correlation with energy sustainability. However, beyond a critical threshold of 35.2 %, this relationship reverses and becomes positive. This turning point underscores the dual nature of natural resource wealth, which can act as either a curse or a blessing, depending on how effectively it is managed and the scale of revenues it generates. The results demonstrate a U-shape relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Furthermore, the study finds that when natural resource wealth interacts with GEPE, it positively impacts energy sustainability. Based on these findings, policymakers should focus on increasing allocations to GEPE to fund renewable energy projects and enhance energy sustainability while establishing robust governance frameworks to manage resources wealth efficiently. • Objective : This study scrutinizes government environmental protection expenditure (GEPE) impact on the relationship between natural resource wealth on energy sustainability. • Methodology : Methodologically, we employed Driscoll and Kraay (DK) standard errors, the Instrumental Variable Generalised Method of Moments (IVGMM), and the Dynamic Panel Threshold Regression (DPTP) model. • Principal results : The findings indicate that, resource wealth exhibits a negative correlation with energy sustainability initially. However, beyond a critical threshold of 35.2 % this relationship reverses, becoming positive. This turning point underscores the dual nature of natural resource wealth, which can act as either a curse or a blessing, depending on how effectively it is managed and the scale of revenues it generates. The results demonstrate a U-shape relationship between natural resource wealth and energy sustainability. Furthermore, the study finds that when natural resource wealth is combined with GEPE, it positively impacts energy sustainability. • Implications : Policymakers should focus on increasing allocations to GEPE to fund renewable energy projects and enhance energy sustainability while establishing robust governance frameworks to manage resources wealth efficiently.

Energy PolicyVol. 207
Université de Dschang (CM), South African College of Applied Psychology (ZA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
18.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.