A stochastic programming framework for Nash bargaining in oligopolistic industrial gas markets with customer contracts

Abstract Mature industries, such as the industrial gases sector, often evolve into oligopolistic markets, which can amplify their susceptibility to market uncertainties. In this work, we propose a two‐stage stochastic Nash bargaining in industrial gases market oligopolies, accounting for electricity price and demand uncertainties. A multi‐period model is developed considering the fair customer and contract type allocation (first‐stage decisions) and the optimal supply chain planning (second‐stage decisions) as a mixed integer linear program. The stochastic customer allocation results in a preference for longer duration contracts while minimizing the customer mobility between firms. The two‐stage approach increases supply chain resilience, allowing for higher operational flexibility in the examined case studies. Under different uncertainty realizations, the stochastic allocation succeeds in satisfying the contracted demand primarily by sales, i.e., more than 90% for the duopoly and 99% for the oligopoly, and the remaining demand is covered by swaps between firms without relying on outsourcing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A stochastic programming framework for Nash bargaining in oligopolistic industrial gas markets with customer contracts

Lazaros G. Papageorgiou, Asimina Marousi, Vassilis M. Charitopoulos, José M. Pinto
1 citations
AIChE Journal
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

A stochastic programming framework for Nash bargaining in oligopolistic industrial gas markets with customer contracts

Lazaros G. Papageorgiou, Asimina Marousi, Vassilis M. Charitopoulos, José M. Pinto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mature industries, such as the industrial gases sector, often evolve into oligopolistic markets, which can amplify their susceptibility to market uncertainties. In this work, we propose a two‐stage stochastic Nash bargaining in industrial gases market oligopolies, accounting for electricity price and demand uncertainties. A multi‐period model is developed considering the fair customer and contract type allocation (first‐stage decisions) and the optimal supply chain planning (second‐stage decisions) as a mixed integer linear program. The stochastic customer allocation results in a preference for longer duration contracts while minimizing the customer mobility between firms. The two‐stage approach increases supply chain resilience, allowing for higher operational flexibility in the examined case studies. Under different uncertainty realizations, the stochastic allocation succeeds in satisfying the contracted demand primarily by sales, i.e., more than 90% for the duopoly and 99% for the oligopoly, and the remaining demand is covered by swaps between firms without relying on outsourcing.

AIChE JournalVol. 71(12)
Linde (United States) (US), University College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A stochastic programming framework for Nash bargaining in oligopolistic industrial gas markets with customer contracts — Lazaros G. Papageorgiou, Asimina Marousi, et al. · AIChE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS