Reconceptualizing the role of socioeconomic material stocks in the leverage points framework to enable transformative change

Addressing the intensifying climate crisis and the transgression of multiple Planetary Boundaries requires a deep socio-ecological transformation. From the perspective of complex systems, the following question arises: Which leverage points need to be addressed to push socio-economic systems in a more sustainable direction? While we agree that the leverage points heuristic proposed by Donella Meadows is useful, we herein argue that it would benefit from emphasizing the pivotal role of socioeconomic material stocks as enablers and inhibitors of transformative change. Currently, socioeconomic stocks are pigeonholed as a shallow leverage point. However, from a socio-metabolic perspective, existing stocks are key drivers of environmental pressures, which foster unsustainable individual behaviours and thus create path dependencies and lock-ins. Stocks can even shape the societal perception of challenges that often foster unsustainable responses. Hence, system-wide socio-ecological change hinges on fundamental changes in socioeconomic stocks. Transformative change requires a reconceptualization of stocks embracing their multidimensional and cross-cutting interconnectedness with the deeper leverage points around system feedback, design, and intent. Rather than looking for the one deep leverage point, we suggest that a well-coordinated intervention strategy needs to target multiple leverage points while systematically considering socioeconomic stocks as an inherent, critical system property to be altered. • The leverage points framework is a key concept for governing transformative change. • However, the biophysical structures of society should not be neglected. • Socioeconomic material stocks are key drivers of unsustainable resource use. • Socioeconomic material stocks offer entry points for transformation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108759
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconceptualizing the role of socioeconomic material stocks in the leverage points framework to enable transformative change

David J. Abson, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Nathalie Spittler, Christian Dorninger et al.
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
article

Reconceptualizing the role of socioeconomic material stocks in the leverage points framework to enable transformative change

David J. Abson, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Nathalie Spittler, Christian Dorninger, Helmut Haberl, Willi Haas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Addressing the intensifying climate crisis and the transgression of multiple Planetary Boundaries requires a deep socio-ecological transformation. From the perspective of complex systems, the following question arises: Which leverage points need to be addressed to push socio-economic systems in a more sustainable direction? While we agree that the leverage points heuristic proposed by Donella Meadows is useful, we herein argue that it would benefit from emphasizing the pivotal role of socioeconomic material stocks as enablers and inhibitors of transformative change. Currently, socioeconomic stocks are pigeonholed as a shallow leverage point. However, from a socio-metabolic perspective, existing stocks are key drivers of environmental pressures, which foster unsustainable individual behaviours and thus create path dependencies and lock-ins. Stocks can even shape the societal perception of challenges that often foster unsustainable responses. Hence, system-wide socio-ecological change hinges on fundamental changes in socioeconomic stocks. Transformative change requires a reconceptualization of stocks embracing their multidimensional and cross-cutting interconnectedness with the deeper leverage points around system feedback, design, and intent. Rather than looking for the one deep leverage point, we suggest that a well-coordinated intervention strategy needs to target multiple leverage points while systematically considering socioeconomic stocks as an inherent, critical system property to be altered. • The leverage points framework is a key concept for governing transformative change. • However, the biophysical structures of society should not be neglected. • Socioeconomic material stocks are key drivers of unsustainable resource use. • Socioeconomic material stocks offer entry points for transformation strategies.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 239
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Institute for Social Anthropology (AT)
Austrian Science Fund, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.