A backwards book? Eugenics and the evolution of R. A. Fisher’s <i>The genetical theory of natural selection</i>

R. A. Fisher’s 1930 book The genetical theory of natural selection has a mixed legacy. Its opening chapters are widely celebrated today for their role in revivifying Darwinism and laying the theoretical foundations of the so-called ‘modern synthesis’. Its closing chapters, meanwhile, are notorious. Across more than 100 pages, Fisher provides an extended meditation on eugenics and the decay of civilizations, past and present. The present article asks how this book of ‘two halves’ came to be. Drawing upon previously unstudied archival evidence, it reconstructs the authorship of this classic scientific text, overturning long-held ideas about the timing and order of the book’s composition. In so doing, the article sheds new and urgent light on a decades-long dispute regarding the relationship between Fisher’s eugenical commitments and his scientific contributions, at a moment in which his legacies are being actively debated once more.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2024.0060
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A backwards book? Eugenics and the evolution of R. A. Fisher’s The genetical theory of natural selection

A. D. Aylward
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

A backwards book? Eugenics and the evolution of R. A. Fisher’s The genetical theory of natural selection

A. D. Aylward
article en

Abstract

R. A. Fisher’s 1930 book The genetical theory of natural selection has a mixed legacy. Its opening chapters are widely celebrated today for their role in revivifying Darwinism and laying the theoretical foundations of the so-called ‘modern synthesis’. Its closing chapters, meanwhile, are notorious. Across more than 100 pages, Fisher provides an extended meditation on eugenics and the decay of civilizations, past and present. The present article asks how this book of ‘two halves’ came to be. Drawing upon previously unstudied archival evidence, it reconstructs the authorship of this classic scientific text, overturning long-held ideas about the timing and order of the book’s composition. In so doing, the article sheds new and urgent light on a decades-long dispute regarding the relationship between Fisher’s eugenical commitments and his scientific contributions, at a moment in which his legacies are being actively debated once more.

Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A backwards book? Eugenics and the evolution of R. A. Fisher’s <i>The genetical theory of natural selection</i> — A. D. Aylward · Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS