Multicenter Validation of Automated Segmentation and Composition Analysis of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles Using Multisequence MRI

Chronic low back pain is a global health issue with considerable socioeconomic burdens and is associated with changes in lumbar paraspinal muscles (LPMs). In this retrospective study, a deep learning method was trained and externally validated for automated LPM segmentation, muscle volume quantification, and fatty infiltration assessment across multisequence MR images. A total of 1302 MR images from 641 participants across five centers were included. Data from two centers were used for model training and tuning, while data from the remaining three centers were used for external testing. Model segmentation performance was evaluated against manual segmentation using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and measurement accuracy was assessed using two one-sided tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The model achieved global DSC values of 0.98 on the internal test set and 0.93 to 0.97 on external test sets. Statistical equivalence between automated and manual measurements of muscle volume and fat ratio was confirmed in most regions (<i>P</i> < .05). Agreement between automated and manual measurements was high (ICCs > 0.92). In conclusion, the proposed automated method accurately segmented LPM and demonstrated statistical equivalence to manual measurements of muscle volume and fatty infiltration ratio across multisequence, multicenter MR images. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Imaging, Muscular, Volume Analysis, Segmentation, Vision, Application Domain, Quantification, Supervised Learning Type of Machine Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240833
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter Validation of Automated Segmentation and Composition Analysis of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles Using Multisequence MRI

Gervase Tuxworth, Julie A. Hides, Janet R. Millner, Enrico De Martino et al.
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Multicenter Validation of Automated Segmentation and Composition Analysis of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles Using Multisequence MRI

Gervase Tuxworth, Julie A. Hides, Janet R. Millner, Enrico De Martino, Zhongyi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is a global health issue with considerable socioeconomic burdens and is associated with changes in lumbar paraspinal muscles (LPMs). In this retrospective study, a deep learning method was trained and externally validated for automated LPM segmentation, muscle volume quantification, and fatty infiltration assessment across multisequence MR images. A total of 1302 MR images from 641 participants across five centers were included. Data from two centers were used for model training and tuning, while data from the remaining three centers were used for external testing. Model segmentation performance was evaluated against manual segmentation using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and measurement accuracy was assessed using two one-sided tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The model achieved global DSC values of 0.98 on the internal test set and 0.93 to 0.97 on external test sets. Statistical equivalence between automated and manual measurements of muscle volume and fat ratio was confirmed in most regions (<i>P</i> < .05). Agreement between automated and manual measurements was high (ICCs > 0.92). In conclusion, the proposed automated method accurately segmented LPM and demonstrated statistical equivalence to manual measurements of muscle volume and fatty infiltration ratio across multisequence, multicenter MR images. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Imaging, Muscular, Volume Analysis, Segmentation, Vision, Application Domain, Quantification, Supervised Learning Type of Machine Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(5)
Griffith University (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.