The Magnitude of Stress in the Prop Depending on Its Manual Tightening

Ensuring the stability of monolithic concrete slabs during construction represents a crucial safety challenge in monolithic reinforced concrete buildings. Theoretical models and structural analyses often assume ideal conditions of supporting props. However, significant deviations occur in practice due to variations in technical condition and installation methods. This study investigates the magnitude of prestressing forces generated in adjustable telescopic steel props depending on manual tightening and hammer blows. Experimental measurements were conducted on different types of props compliant with EN 1065, including both new and worn specimens, to simulate real on-site conditions. The influence of worker body weight was also analyzed. The results confirmed that the technical condition of the prop is the decisive factor affecting the level of prestress. Props in poor condition achieved substantially lower and inconsistent prestressing forces, while new props subjected to five hammer blows reached maximum values up to 13.16 kN. This difference can significantly influence static calculations for slab construction. Contrary to expectations, the influence of worker body weight was not statistically significant; instead, the dominant role was played by installation technique and the accuracy of hammer blows. The findings contribute to the optimization of safety guidelines and the improvement of calculation models for temporary support systems in monolithic construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162957
Primary Topic
Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Magnitude of Stress in the Prop Depending on Its Manual Tightening

Marek Ďubek, Peter Makýš, Patrik Šťastný, Milan Švolík et al.
Buildings
Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
article

The Magnitude of Stress in the Prop Depending on Its Manual Tightening

Marek Ďubek, Peter Makýš, Patrik Šťastný, Milan Švolík, Ján Hlina
article en

Abstract

Ensuring the stability of monolithic concrete slabs during construction represents a crucial safety challenge in monolithic reinforced concrete buildings. Theoretical models and structural analyses often assume ideal conditions of supporting props. However, significant deviations occur in practice due to variations in technical condition and installation methods. This study investigates the magnitude of prestressing forces generated in adjustable telescopic steel props depending on manual tightening and hammer blows. Experimental measurements were conducted on different types of props compliant with EN 1065, including both new and worn specimens, to simulate real on-site conditions. The influence of worker body weight was also analyzed. The results confirmed that the technical condition of the prop is the decisive factor affecting the level of prestress. Props in poor condition achieved substantially lower and inconsistent prestressing forces, while new props subjected to five hammer blows reached maximum values up to 13.16 kN. This difference can significantly influence static calculations for slab construction. Contrary to expectations, the influence of worker body weight was not statistically significant; instead, the dominant role was played by installation technique and the accuracy of hammer blows. The findings contribute to the optimization of safety guidelines and the improvement of calculation models for temporary support systems in monolithic construction.

BuildingsVol. 15(16)
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.