From Description to Diagnostics: Assessing AI’s Capabilities in Forensic Gunshot Wound Classification

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into forensic science is expanding, yet its application in firearm injury diagnostics remains underexplored. This study investigates the diagnostic capabilities of ChatGPT-4 (February 2024 update) in classifying gunshot wounds, specifically distinguishing entrance from exit wounds, and evaluates its potential, limitations, and forensic applicability. <b>Methods</b>: ChatGPT-4 was tested using three datasets: (1) 36 firearm injury images from an external database, (2) 40 images of intact skin from the forensic archive of the University of Catania (negative control), and (3) 40 real-case firearm injury images from the same archive. The AI's performance was assessed before and after machine learning (ML) training, with classification accuracy evaluated through descriptive and inferential statistics. <b>Results</b>: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in identifying entrance wounds post-ML training, with enhanced descriptive accuracy of morphological features. However, its performance in classifying exit wounds remained limited, reflecting challenges noted in forensic literature. The AI showed high accuracy (95%) in distinguishing intact skin from injuries in the negative control analysis. A lack of standardized datasets and contextual forensic information contributed to misclassification, particularly for exit wounds. <b>Conclusions</b>: While ChatGPT-4 is not yet a substitute for specialized forensic deep learning models, its iterative learning capacity and descriptive improvements suggest potential as a supplementary diagnostic tool in forensic pathology. However, risks such as overconfident misclassifications and AI-generated hallucinations highlight the need for expert oversight and cautious integration in forensic workflows. Future research should prioritize dataset expansion, contextual data integration, and standardized validation protocols to enhance AI reliability in medico-legal diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15162094
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Description to Diagnostics: Assessing AI’s Capabilities in Forensic Gunshot Wound Classification

Elena Guardo, Mario Chisari, Monica Salerno, Francesco Sessa et al.
3 citations
Diagnostics
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
4.08
article

From Description to Diagnostics: Assessing AI’s Capabilities in Forensic Gunshot Wound Classification

Elena Guardo, Mario Chisari, Monica Salerno, Francesco Sessa, Cristoforo Pomara, Massimiliano Esposito, L Mauro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into forensic science is expanding, yet its application in firearm injury diagnostics remains underexplored. This study investigates the diagnostic capabilities of ChatGPT-4 (February 2024 update) in classifying gunshot wounds, specifically distinguishing entrance from exit wounds, and evaluates its potential, limitations, and forensic applicability. <b>Methods</b>: ChatGPT-4 was tested using three datasets: (1) 36 firearm injury images from an external database, (2) 40 images of intact skin from the forensic archive of the University of Catania (negative control), and (3) 40 real-case firearm injury images from the same archive. The AI's performance was assessed before and after machine learning (ML) training, with classification accuracy evaluated through descriptive and inferential statistics. <b>Results</b>: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in identifying entrance wounds post-ML training, with enhanced descriptive accuracy of morphological features. However, its performance in classifying exit wounds remained limited, reflecting challenges noted in forensic literature. The AI showed high accuracy (95%) in distinguishing intact skin from injuries in the negative control analysis. A lack of standardized datasets and contextual forensic information contributed to misclassification, particularly for exit wounds. <b>Conclusions</b>: While ChatGPT-4 is not yet a substitute for specialized forensic deep learning models, its iterative learning capacity and descriptive improvements suggest potential as a supplementary diagnostic tool in forensic pathology. However, risks such as overconfident misclassifications and AI-generated hallucinations highlight the need for expert oversight and cautious integration in forensic workflows. Future research should prioritize dataset expansion, contextual data integration, and standardized validation protocols to enhance AI reliability in medico-legal diagnostics.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(16)
Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of Catania (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.