Navigating Medical Curriculum Renewal: Faculty Experiences of Implementing a Renewed Assessment Plan Through the Lens of Change Theory

Curriculum renewal in medical education has received significant attention in recent years. While contemporary literature has highlighted various recommendations to guide curriculum renewal, an important perspective remains underexplored-the experiences of faculty who are responsible for implementing these changes. In this article, we provide insights into faculty's experiences of the change process as they implement a renewed assessment plan for a medical programme, offering some recommendations for faculty development. A qualitative interpretivist approach was used. Focus group discussions were conducted with faculty who are teaching and assessing students on the first three modules in the renewed medical curriculum. A three-tiered approach suggested by Miles and Huberman guided the analysis of the data. Coding was inductive and thematic. Four themes were identified, namely the nature of change, a commitment to changing the purpose of assessment, the need for collaboration in taking the plan forward and the need for a culture that supports learning. The findings suggest that while there are various challenges associated with the implementation of the renewed assessment plan, faculty were generally invested in the process. Furthermore, there is a distinct call to advance faculty development to support skills required to undertake assessment renewal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02480-y
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Medical Curriculum Renewal: Faculty Experiences of Implementing a Renewed Assessment Plan Through the Lens of Change Theory

Elize Archer, Liezl Smit, Karin Baatjes, Rhoda Meyer
Medical Science Educator
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Navigating Medical Curriculum Renewal: Faculty Experiences of Implementing a Renewed Assessment Plan Through the Lens of Change Theory

Elize Archer, Liezl Smit, Karin Baatjes, Rhoda Meyer
article en

Abstract

Curriculum renewal in medical education has received significant attention in recent years. While contemporary literature has highlighted various recommendations to guide curriculum renewal, an important perspective remains underexplored-the experiences of faculty who are responsible for implementing these changes. In this article, we provide insights into faculty's experiences of the change process as they implement a renewed assessment plan for a medical programme, offering some recommendations for faculty development. A qualitative interpretivist approach was used. Focus group discussions were conducted with faculty who are teaching and assessing students on the first three modules in the renewed medical curriculum. A three-tiered approach suggested by Miles and Huberman guided the analysis of the data. Coding was inductive and thematic. Four themes were identified, namely the nature of change, a commitment to changing the purpose of assessment, the need for collaboration in taking the plan forward and the need for a culture that supports learning. The findings suggest that while there are various challenges associated with the implementation of the renewed assessment plan, faculty were generally invested in the process. Furthermore, there is a distinct call to advance faculty development to support skills required to undertake assessment renewal.

Medical Science EducatorVol. 35(6)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Universiteit Stellenbosch
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.