INSYTE: A Classification Framework for Traditional to Agentic AI Systems

Existing classification frameworks for AI and autonomous systems are being outpaced by recent advancements in AI technologies. This limits their applicability to modern intelligent systems, particularly agentic AI systems (autonomous systems that leverage foundation models to achieve wide-ranging, multi-layered goals). To address this deficiency, we introduce INSYTE, a multi-faceted framework that supports the classification of AI systems ranging from traditional rule-based systems to cutting-edge embodied AI and agentic systems. To that end, INSYTE considers the essential characteristics of an AI system across eight key dimensions grouped into four categories: system design ( underspecification and adaptiveness ); functionality ( breadth and depth ); operating environment ( diversity and dynamism ); and independence from human operational control ( intervention and oversight ). Different AI systems (or versions of systems) yield different ‘patterns’ on an eight-axis radar chart that INSYTE uses to provide an immediate visual summary of an AI system’s overall capability and a detailed representation of its individual characteristics. The INSYTE framework aligns with OECD’s definition of deployed AI systems, which is becoming the standard definition used by legislators and developers worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3760424
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSYTE: A Classification Framework for Traditional to Agentic AI Systems

Phillip Morgan, Radu Călinescu, Paul Noordhof, Ernest Lim et al.
2 citations
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
article

INSYTE: A Classification Framework for Traditional to Agentic AI Systems

Phillip Morgan, Radu Călinescu, Paul Noordhof, Ernest Lim, Ibrahim Habli, Joanna Hodge, John McDermid, Tom Lawton, Helen Monkhouse, Simon Burton, John Molloy, Colin Paterson, Zoë Porter, Philippa Conmy, Jie Zou, Isobel Standen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Existing classification frameworks for AI and autonomous systems are being outpaced by recent advancements in AI technologies. This limits their applicability to modern intelligent systems, particularly agentic AI systems (autonomous systems that leverage foundation models to achieve wide-ranging, multi-layered goals). To address this deficiency, we introduce INSYTE, a multi-faceted framework that supports the classification of AI systems ranging from traditional rule-based systems to cutting-edge embodied AI and agentic systems. To that end, INSYTE considers the essential characteristics of an AI system across eight key dimensions grouped into four categories: system design ( underspecification and adaptiveness ); functionality ( breadth and depth ); operating environment ( diversity and dynamism ); and independence from human operational control ( intervention and oversight ). Different AI systems (or versions of systems) yield different ‘patterns’ on an eight-axis radar chart that INSYTE uses to provide an immediate visual summary of an AI system’s overall capability and a detailed representation of its individual characteristics. The INSYTE framework aligns with OECD’s definition of deployed AI systems, which is becoming the standard definition used by legislators and developers worldwide.

ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive SystemsVol. 20(3)
Horiba (Japan) (JP), Land Sea Air Autonomy (United States) (US), Horiba (United Kingdom) (GB), Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of York (GB), MIRA (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.