Geopolitical rebordering? External boundary formation in the European Union

This paper analyses the impact of geopolitical pressures on external boundary formation in the European Union (EU). In contrast to bellicist and realist expectations, it argues that the EU’s reaction to heightened geopolitical pressures is predominantly shaped by its regulatory model of political development. While the EU reacts to mounting pressures by increasing the closure of its security-relevant boundaries with geopolitical rivals, executive competences and resources for boundary control remain with the member states. To examine these expectations, the paper leverages a novel dataset on EU boundary configurations. The results support our expectations of regulatory geopolitical rebordering. While the closure of the EU’s external boundaries has increased over the past two decades, and especially so for security-relevant boundaries with rival powers, the same geopolitical pressures have had no effect on EU executive control. We conclude that, as a primarily regulatory polity, the EU focuses on regulating the openness of its external boundaries in response to geopolitical threats rather than building centralised capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2548346
Citations
6
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
51.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical rebordering? External boundary formation in the European Union

Frank Schimmelfennig, Christian Freudlsperger, Buket Buse Demirci
6 citations
Journal of European Public Policy
European Union Policy and Governance
51.13
article

Geopolitical rebordering? External boundary formation in the European Union

Frank Schimmelfennig, Christian Freudlsperger, Buket Buse Demirci
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of geopolitical pressures on external boundary formation in the European Union (EU). In contrast to bellicist and realist expectations, it argues that the EU’s reaction to heightened geopolitical pressures is predominantly shaped by its regulatory model of political development. While the EU reacts to mounting pressures by increasing the closure of its security-relevant boundaries with geopolitical rivals, executive competences and resources for boundary control remain with the member states. To examine these expectations, the paper leverages a novel dataset on EU boundary configurations. The results support our expectations of regulatory geopolitical rebordering. While the closure of the EU’s external boundaries has increased over the past two decades, and especially so for security-relevant boundaries with rival powers, the same geopolitical pressures have had no effect on EU executive control. We conclude that, as a primarily regulatory polity, the EU focuses on regulating the openness of its external boundaries in response to geopolitical threats rather than building centralised capacity.

Journal of European Public Policy
ETH Zurich (CH)
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
European Union Policy and Governance
51.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.