Unrecognized and Unreported Concussions Among Community Rugby Players

This study examined the prevalence of intentionally unreported and potentially unrecognized concussions in community rugby players and whether nondisclosure reasons vary by sex, position, or playing history. An online survey was completed by 1037 players (41.0% female; mean age 31.6 ± 11.3 years; 10.1 ± 8.1 years playing) who reported diagnosed, unreported, and unrecognized concussions. Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PRs), and Fisher's exact tests compared reasons for nondisclosure. The diagnosed, unreported, and unrecognized concussion rates were 66.5%, 32.4%, and 42.2%, respectively. Players with diagnosed concussions had a 7.2-fold higher prevalence of nondisclosure and a 2.3-fold higher prevalence of nonrecognition. A longer playing history was linked to greater nondisclosure (PR: 1.2), and males had a higher prevalence of nonrecognition (PR: 1.4). Position and sex were not associated with nondisclosure; position and playing history did not affect recognition. While nondisclosure reasons were mostly consistent across demographics, players with a history of concussion were more likely to report avoiding removal from games or practices (38.5% vs. 13.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Concussions are common in community rugby, with high rates of underreporting and unawareness, influenced by experience and prior concussions. These findings underscore the need for better education and reporting systems to improve player safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080278
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unrecognized and Unreported Concussions Among Community Rugby Players

Lisa Ryan, Katelyn Costantini, C. Buz Swanik, Katherine J. Hunzinger et al.
2 citations
Sports
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
2.71
article

Unrecognized and Unreported Concussions Among Community Rugby Players

Lisa Ryan, Katelyn Costantini, C. Buz Swanik, Katherine J. Hunzinger, Thomas A. Buckley, Ray King, Ed Daly, A. Daniels, Rachael M Wittmer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence of intentionally unreported and potentially unrecognized concussions in community rugby players and whether nondisclosure reasons vary by sex, position, or playing history. An online survey was completed by 1037 players (41.0% female; mean age 31.6 ± 11.3 years; 10.1 ± 8.1 years playing) who reported diagnosed, unreported, and unrecognized concussions. Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PRs), and Fisher's exact tests compared reasons for nondisclosure. The diagnosed, unreported, and unrecognized concussion rates were 66.5%, 32.4%, and 42.2%, respectively. Players with diagnosed concussions had a 7.2-fold higher prevalence of nondisclosure and a 2.3-fold higher prevalence of nonrecognition. A longer playing history was linked to greater nondisclosure (PR: 1.2), and males had a higher prevalence of nonrecognition (PR: 1.4). Position and sex were not associated with nondisclosure; position and playing history did not affect recognition. While nondisclosure reasons were mostly consistent across demographics, players with a history of concussion were more likely to report avoiding removal from games or practices (38.5% vs. 13.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Concussions are common in community rugby, with high rates of underreporting and unawareness, influenced by experience and prior concussions. These findings underscore the need for better education and reporting systems to improve player safety.

SportsVol. 13(8)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Good Shepherd Penn Partners (US), Technological University Dublin (IE), Atlantic Technological University (IE), University of Delaware (US)
University of Delaware
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.