Data Governance in the Geopolitics of Energy Transition: Comparing Regional Energy Cooperation in ASEAN and the EU

Data governance has become a critical enabler in the geopolitics of energy transition, influencing regional cooperation, energy security, and climate leadership. This article compares the contrasting approaches of the European Union and ASEAN to data governance in the context of energy transition and examines their geopolitical implications. The EU’s centralised model is underpinned by strong institutional capacity, policy alignment, interdependence among member states, and political will. These conditions support robust data governance across regional power grids, critical raw material supply chains, and carbon markets, enhancing the EU’s energy resilience and influence in global climate standard-setting. In contrast, despite advancing regional energy initiatives, ASEAN’s decentralised and informal approach to data governance presents both opportunities and challenges for deepening regional data integration. Through comparative case studies, this article investigates how energy data governance is both shaped and reshapes the geopolitics of energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10429
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Governance in the Geopolitics of Energy Transition: Comparing Regional Energy Cooperation in ASEAN and the EU

Kaho Yu, Jinseok Sung, Yunheng Zhou
1 citations
Politics and Governance
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
article

Data Governance in the Geopolitics of Energy Transition: Comparing Regional Energy Cooperation in ASEAN and the EU

Kaho Yu, Jinseok Sung, Yunheng Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Data governance has become a critical enabler in the geopolitics of energy transition, influencing regional cooperation, energy security, and climate leadership. This article compares the contrasting approaches of the European Union and ASEAN to data governance in the context of energy transition and examines their geopolitical implications. The EU’s centralised model is underpinned by strong institutional capacity, policy alignment, interdependence among member states, and political will. These conditions support robust data governance across regional power grids, critical raw material supply chains, and carbon markets, enhancing the EU’s energy resilience and influence in global climate standard-setting. In contrast, despite advancing regional energy initiatives, ASEAN’s decentralised and informal approach to data governance presents both opportunities and challenges for deepening regional data integration. Through comparative case studies, this article investigates how energy data governance is both shaped and reshapes the geopolitics of energy transition.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 13
National University of Singapore (SG), Korean Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (KR), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.