Extended Abstract: Co-Creating Engineering Capstone Curriculum

This paper presents the redesign of a bioengineering capstone curriculum through the principles of liberatory pedagogy and service design, emphasizing student agency, transversal dialogue, and real-world engagement. Traditional capstone structures can constrain research depth and community collaboration, leading to designs disconnected from user needs. In response, we implemented a two-semester structure, with an engineering communication course preceding the design capstone. This shift prioritizes iterative dialogue, user engagement, and problem-posing education to foster more meaningful and context-driven solutions. A key component of this redesign is a collection of engaging videos on service design methodology, incorporating multiple perspectives and interactive assessments to deepen students' critical awareness of engineering's societal impact. This revised curriculum fosters student agency and ethical awareness through multimodal communicative activities, equipping future engineers to develop meaningful, real-world solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm64814.2025.00072
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended Abstract: Co-Creating Engineering Capstone Curriculum

Allison Hutchison, Lee S. Stewart, Hudson Tumey
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Extended Abstract: Co-Creating Engineering Capstone Curriculum

Allison Hutchison, Lee S. Stewart, Hudson Tumey
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the redesign of a bioengineering capstone curriculum through the principles of liberatory pedagogy and service design, emphasizing student agency, transversal dialogue, and real-world engagement. Traditional capstone structures can constrain research depth and community collaboration, leading to designs disconnected from user needs. In response, we implemented a two-semester structure, with an engineering communication course preceding the design capstone. This shift prioritizes iterative dialogue, user engagement, and problem-posing education to foster more meaningful and context-driven solutions. A key component of this redesign is a collection of engaging videos on service design methodology, incorporating multiple perspectives and interactive assessments to deepen students' critical awareness of engineering's societal impact. This revised curriculum fosters student agency and ethical awareness through multimodal communicative activities, equipping future engineers to develop meaningful, real-world solutions.

Cornell University (US)
Cornell University
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extended Abstract: Co-Creating Engineering Capstone Curriculum — Allison Hutchison, Lee S. Stewart, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS