Against the Reading Response: Digital Meaning Making Through Social Annotation and Authentic Content Genres

This paper calls for technical and professional communication (TPC) teachers and researchers to reexamine the importance of reading and the practices and genres that can be assigned to enhance student interaction with course content. While a renewed interest in “critical” and “mindful” reading has taken hold in various fields, TPC has not actively intervened in reading research since the rise of mobile computing. To reopen the conversation about reading in TPC teaching and research, we present two technologically mediated alternatives to traditional, linear, alphabetic reading responses: social annotations and authentic content genres. These tasks, we argue, tap into the social nature of reading as a meaning making process. We conclude by calling for more empirical research on reading in pedagogical and professional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm64814.2025.00062
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Against the Reading Response: Digital Meaning Making Through Social Annotation and Authentic Content Genres

Gavin Johnson, Allegra W. Smith
2 links
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Against the Reading Response: Digital Meaning Making Through Social Annotation and Authentic Content Genres

Gavin Johnson, Allegra W. Smith
article en

Abstract

This paper calls for technical and professional communication (TPC) teachers and researchers to reexamine the importance of reading and the practices and genres that can be assigned to enhance student interaction with course content. While a renewed interest in “critical” and “mindful” reading has taken hold in various fields, TPC has not actively intervened in reading research since the rise of mobile computing. To reopen the conversation about reading in TPC teaching and research, we present two technologically mediated alternatives to traditional, linear, alphabetic reading responses: social annotations and authentic content genres. These tasks, we argue, tap into the social nature of reading as a meaning making process. We conclude by calling for more empirical research on reading in pedagogical and professional contexts.

Texas Christian University (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.