The Advantage of Big Team Science: Lessons Learned from Cognitive Science

The replication crisis in psychology and related sciences contributed to the adoption of large-scale research initiatives known as Big Team Science (BTS). BTS has made significant advances in addressing issues of replication, statistical power, and diversity through the use of larger samples and more representative cross-cultural data. However, while these collaborations hold great potential, they also introduce unique challenges related to their scale. Drawing on experiences from successful BTS projects, we identified and outlined key strategies for overcoming diversity, volunteering, and capacity challenges. We emphasize the need for the implementation of strong organizational practices and the distribution of responsibility to prevent common pitfalls. Ultimately, we call for reflection on the strengths and limitations of BTS to enhance the quality, generalizability, and impact of research across disciplines. This work complements existing BTS guides by offering experientially-grounded, discipline-specific strategies and addressing underexplored logistical, ethical, and epistemological challenges in large scale collaborations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yvm5h_v2
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Advantage of Big Team Science: Lessons Learned from Cognitive Science

Jordan Wagge, Delphine De Moor, Yufang Yang, Drew Altschul et al.
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

The Advantage of Big Team Science: Lessons Learned from Cognitive Science

Jordan Wagge, Delphine De Moor, Yufang Yang, Drew Altschul, Erin Michelle Buchanan, John Protzko, Marta Kowal, Yuri G. Pavlov, Kathleen Schmidt, Niels G. Mede, Kimberly C Doell, Jeremy K. Miller, Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Leanne Boucher, Michał Misiak, Faisal Mushtaq, Rachael Miller, Anna Exner, Biljana Gjoneska, Jacob Francisco Miranda, Marta Topor, David C. Vaidis, Catia Margarida Oliveira, Flávio Azevedo, Ingmar Visser, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Ekaterina Pronizius, Yashvin Seetahul
article en

Abstract

The replication crisis in psychology and related sciences contributed to the adoption of large-scale research initiatives known as Big Team Science (BTS). BTS has made significant advances in addressing issues of replication, statistical power, and diversity through the use of larger samples and more representative cross-cultural data. However, while these collaborations hold great potential, they also introduce unique challenges related to their scale. Drawing on experiences from successful BTS projects, we identified and outlined key strategies for overcoming diversity, volunteering, and capacity challenges. We emphasize the need for the implementation of strong organizational practices and the distribution of responsibility to prevent common pitfalls. Ultimately, we call for reflection on the strengths and limitations of BTS to enhance the quality, generalizability, and impact of research across disciplines. This work complements existing BTS guides by offering experientially-grounded, discipline-specific strategies and addressing underexplored logistical, ethical, and epistemological challenges in large scale collaborations.

Leverhulme Trust, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.