Modeling Self-Reference in Schizophrenia: General and Specific Mechanisms Underlying Decision-Making are Differentially Associated with Paranoia

Background and Hypothesis: Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) show difficulties deciding whether social cues are meant for them, which are implicated in paranoia and social functioning. Recent computational modeling findings suggest that such disruptions may stem from inefficient and biased “evidence accumulation”—the process of gathering information to make a decision. However, it is unclear whether these disruptions are specific to social information processing, particularly self-referential processing, or whether they reflect general processing deficits. Study Design: Mechanisms and clinical correlates of decision-making were examined in 39 SZ and 42 controls across three domains: self-referential social processing (eye contact detection task), non-self-referential social processing (facial gender identification task), and non-social general perceptual processing (visual integration task). Drift Diffusion Models characterized whether inefficient and biased evidence accumulation in SZ was specific to self-referential processing or reflected more general deficits. Study Results: Relative to controls, evidence accumulation in SZ was less sensitive to visual cues during eye contact detection and gender identification—not visual integration. Biased evidence accumulation occurred in SZ only during eye contact detection. In SZ, less sensitive evidence accumulation during eye contact detection and gender identification—not visual integration—was associated with worse paranoia, even after controlling for general processing difficulties. Conclusions: Aberrant self-referential social processing in SZ may be shaped by mechanisms supporting social and self-referential—but not basic visual—information processing. Paranoia was associated with disrupted processing of social—not non-social—information. Therefore, disrupted evidence accumulation in SZ may have differential symptom associations across social and non-social contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9b23k_v1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Self-Reference in Schizophrenia: General and Specific Mechanisms Underlying Decision-Making are Differentially Associated with Paranoia

Carly A Lasagna, Timothy J. Pleskac, Alexander Weigard, Ivy F. Tso
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Modeling Self-Reference in Schizophrenia: General and Specific Mechanisms Underlying Decision-Making are Differentially Associated with Paranoia

Carly A Lasagna, Timothy J. Pleskac, Alexander Weigard, Ivy F. Tso
article en

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis: Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) show difficulties deciding whether social cues are meant for them, which are implicated in paranoia and social functioning. Recent computational modeling findings suggest that such disruptions may stem from inefficient and biased “evidence accumulation”—the process of gathering information to make a decision. However, it is unclear whether these disruptions are specific to social information processing, particularly self-referential processing, or whether they reflect general processing deficits. Study Design: Mechanisms and clinical correlates of decision-making were examined in 39 SZ and 42 controls across three domains: self-referential social processing (eye contact detection task), non-self-referential social processing (facial gender identification task), and non-social general perceptual processing (visual integration task). Drift Diffusion Models characterized whether inefficient and biased evidence accumulation in SZ was specific to self-referential processing or reflected more general deficits. Study Results: Relative to controls, evidence accumulation in SZ was less sensitive to visual cues during eye contact detection and gender identification—not visual integration. Biased evidence accumulation occurred in SZ only during eye contact detection. In SZ, less sensitive evidence accumulation during eye contact detection and gender identification—not visual integration—was associated with worse paranoia, even after controlling for general processing difficulties. Conclusions: Aberrant self-referential social processing in SZ may be shaped by mechanisms supporting social and self-referential—but not basic visual—information processing. Paranoia was associated with disrupted processing of social—not non-social—information. Therefore, disrupted evidence accumulation in SZ may have differential symptom associations across social and non-social contexts.

National Science Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling Self-Reference in Schizophrenia: General and Specific Mechanisms Underlying Decision-Making are Differentially Associated with Paranoia — Carly A Lasagna, Timothy J. Pleskac, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS